2013
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing a questionnaire for assessment of awareness and acceptance of diversity in healthcare institutions

Abstract: BackgroundTo develop a healthcare environment that is congruent with diversity among care providers and care recipients and to eliminate ethnic discrimination, it’s important to map out and assess caregivers’ awareness and acceptance of diversity. Because of a lack of standardized questionnaires in the Swedish context, this study designed and standardized a questionnaire: the Assessment of Awareness and Acceptance of Diversity in Healthcare Institutions (AAAD, for short).MethodThe questionnaire was developed i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, Cronbach’s alphas were women’s decision-making autonomy (13 items, 0.764); women’s accepting attitude of justified wife-beating (five items with 0.894); physical violence (seven items, 0.876); psychological violence (15 items, 0.925); sexual violence (five items, 0.812); and gender inequitable norm (seven items, 0.867). This tool had a Cronbach’s alpha consistent with other studies with a range of 0.68–0.80,39 higher than 0.80,40 and greater than 0.90 41. Furthermore, this finding is similar to that of a study conducted in Sweden which showed that the Cronbach’s alpha of the VAW assessment tool was higher than the minimum recommended value (>0.70) 42…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Specifically, Cronbach’s alphas were women’s decision-making autonomy (13 items, 0.764); women’s accepting attitude of justified wife-beating (five items with 0.894); physical violence (seven items, 0.876); psychological violence (15 items, 0.925); sexual violence (five items, 0.812); and gender inequitable norm (seven items, 0.867). This tool had a Cronbach’s alpha consistent with other studies with a range of 0.68–0.80,39 higher than 0.80,40 and greater than 0.90 41. Furthermore, this finding is similar to that of a study conducted in Sweden which showed that the Cronbach’s alpha of the VAW assessment tool was higher than the minimum recommended value (>0.70) 42…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In the literature, it has been emphasized that a valid measuring tool is required in order to evaluate the cultural competences of nurses (Emami & Safipour, 2013; Fitzgerald, Cronin, & Campinha-Bacote, 2009). For this purpose, the Nurse Cultural Competence Scale (NCCS) was developed by Perng and Watson (2012) by using the Mokken scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, it is necessary to create an inclusive and supportive environment without discrimination for every member of society and to protect the health and well-being of individuals (Emami & Safipour, 2013). It is very important to develop the necessary skills for effective interpersonal, interethnic, and intercultural group interactions among university students and to promote values, attitudes, and behaviors that support cultural diversity to ensure the intercultural sensitivity (Bonder et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%