2008
DOI: 10.1353/ajm.2008.0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructibility and duality for simple holonomic modules on complex symplectic manifolds

Abstract: Consider a complex symplectic manifold X and the algebroid stack W X of deformation-quantization. For two regular holonomic W Xmodules L i (i = 0, 1) supported by smooth Lagrangian submanifolds, we prove that the complex RHom W X (L 1 , L 0 ) is perverse over the field W pt and dual to the complex RHom W X (L 0 , L 1 ).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If D • , E • are simple holonomic DQ-modules on S supported on smooth Lagrangians L, M , then Kashiwara and Schapira [28] show that RH om(D Observe that the work of Behrend-Fantechi and Kashiwara-Schapira cited above supports the existence of (6.12)-(6.13): there are natural products But since (6.13) is a morphism of complexes, not of perverse sheaves, Theorem 2.7(i) does not apply, so we cannot construct µ L,M,N by naïvely gluing data on an open cover, as we have been doing in §3- §6.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If D • , E • are simple holonomic DQ-modules on S supported on smooth Lagrangians L, M , then Kashiwara and Schapira [28] show that RH om(D Observe that the work of Behrend-Fantechi and Kashiwara-Schapira cited above supports the existence of (6.12)-(6.13): there are natural products But since (6.13) is a morphism of complexes, not of perverse sheaves, Theorem 2.7(i) does not apply, so we cannot construct µ L,M,N by naïvely gluing data on an open cover, as we have been doing in §3- §6.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will work with Fréchet algebras to make things simpler. The correct generalization beyond Fréchet algebras will be bornological algebras as in [14] and has been used recently by [21] and [18]. The generalization to this context is straightforward.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brav et al [BBDJS15] and Bussi [Bus14] give a construction of the virtual de Rham cohomology of a pair of Lagrangians in terms of the hypercohomology of a perverse sheaf supported on . As explained in [BBDJS15, Remark 6.15], it follows from the work of Kashiwara and Schapira [KS08] that the perverse sheaf can be recovered as . The same remark speculates on a connection between and .…”
Section: Floer Cohomology and The Fukaya Categorymentioning
confidence: 97%