2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructed wetland microcosms for the removal of organic micropollutants from freshwater aquaculture effluents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Removal in river water treatment with CWs [19][20][21], higher than 52%, are similar to the results obtained in the present study. The ATZ is completely removed from aquaculture effluents in vertical flow constructed wetland [22], which is not the case for the horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland and free surface wetland, was removal range around 50 -70 % [23][24][25], which are in concordance with the removal obtained in the present work. The MDHJ removals were in the range of those reported in the treatment of domestic wastewater with free surface wetland, around 70 -98 % [26][27] higher than in the treatment of river water, around 58% [28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Removal in river water treatment with CWs [19][20][21], higher than 52%, are similar to the results obtained in the present study. The ATZ is completely removed from aquaculture effluents in vertical flow constructed wetland [22], which is not the case for the horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland and free surface wetland, was removal range around 50 -70 % [23][24][25], which are in concordance with the removal obtained in the present work. The MDHJ removals were in the range of those reported in the treatment of domestic wastewater with free surface wetland, around 70 -98 % [26][27] higher than in the treatment of river water, around 58% [28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…0.033 µg/g, indicating MC probable adsorption. Considering the inputs of MC in the water going into the CWs along the 7 weeks and making an estimation of the mass of substrate used in the current systems [26], it can be estimated that ca. half of the MC-LR amount remained adsorbed to the substrate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the experiments, circulating tubes with pumps were placed in each container to promote water circulation in the microcosms. More details are provided in Gorito et al [26]. Microcosms were kept under greenhouse-like conditions (in the Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, University of Porto), namely, natural day/night regime, with a temperature variation between 15 to 25 • C, between September and November 2018.…”
Section: Sampling Microcosm Setup and Experimental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These contaminants tend to be small, organic molecules that persist through conventional wastewater treatment processes, thus meriting their identification as recalcitrant contaminants (Andreozzi et al 2003;Le-Minh et al 2010). Even in trace amounts, these contaminants can negatively affect the environment, including aquatic life (Gorito et al 2018;Jimenez et al 2018), and public health (Ternes 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%