2017
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construct Validity and Reliability of the SARA Gait and Posture Sub-scale in Early Onset Ataxia

Abstract: Aim: In children, gait and posture assessment provides a crucial marker for the early characterization, surveillance and treatment evaluation of early onset ataxia (EOA). For reliable data entry of studies targeting at gait and posture improvement, uniform quantitative biomarkers are necessary. Until now, the pediatric test construct of gait and posture scores of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia sub-scale (SARA) is still unclear. In the present study, we aimed to validate the construct validity an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
35
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Within a multi-center cohort of 49 patients with early-onset cerebellar ataxia and/or cerebellar atrophy, two patients were identified with SPTBN2 mutations and diagnosed with cerebellar ataxia, based on the validated scales scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA) [ 39 , 40 , 41 ] and international cooperative ataxia rating scale (ICARS) [ 42 , 43 , 44 ]. Clinical follow-up from the age at onset and MRI controls of both patients were done at the same hospital.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within a multi-center cohort of 49 patients with early-onset cerebellar ataxia and/or cerebellar atrophy, two patients were identified with SPTBN2 mutations and diagnosed with cerebellar ataxia, based on the validated scales scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA) [ 39 , 40 , 41 ] and international cooperative ataxia rating scale (ICARS) [ 42 , 43 , 44 ]. Clinical follow-up from the age at onset and MRI controls of both patients were done at the same hospital.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While small changes in the scores of these scales might be statistically significant in trials, the impact of such in patient's symptoms and quality of life can be meaningless, being important to thoroughly define which score changes are, in fact, impactful [249]. Despite this, several studies have proposed these scores as the best qualitative measure for ataxic symptoms and these have been validated in several populations [250][251][252][253][254]. Since consensus on the best scale to use is hard to achieve with current evidence, clinical researchers should report several different scores, as this allows direct comparison with other studies, which are likely to have used at least one of the same scales.…”
Section: Clinical Trials In Sca3: Advances and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 . The SARA subscore posture&gait is defined by the first three items of the SARA score which capture gait, standing and sitting 30 . #Strides denotes the number of steps analysed for the given walking condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%