2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3999(00)00102-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construct validation of the hospital anxiety and depression scale with clinical populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
202
2
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 308 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
202
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This cutoff score was reported by Ibbotson et al (1994) to be the best for identifying patients likely to have an interview based diagnosis of depressive or anxiety disorder. The reliability, validity and factor structure of the HADS has been established in a variety of clinical populations (Moorey et al, 1991;Johnston et al, 2000;Mykletun et al, 2001;Smith et al, 2002) and validated in this population of cancer patients. We found that a cutoff of 15 or above on the total HADS score gave a (Walker et al, in press).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cutoff score was reported by Ibbotson et al (1994) to be the best for identifying patients likely to have an interview based diagnosis of depressive or anxiety disorder. The reliability, validity and factor structure of the HADS has been established in a variety of clinical populations (Moorey et al, 1991;Johnston et al, 2000;Mykletun et al, 2001;Smith et al, 2002) and validated in this population of cancer patients. We found that a cutoff of 15 or above on the total HADS score gave a (Walker et al, in press).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This 14-item questionnaire has been validated in a number of clinical situations and has been widely used in patients with cancer. 49,50 Global Symptom Evaluation. Patients were asked about their fatigue (worse, about the same, or better) after starting study medication.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an instrument of easy application and has been used extensively in studies with non-psychiatric clinical populations. 14,15 Data analysis Satiation was summarized as the number of calories (Kcal) ingested until the point of maximum satiation was reached. Postprandial symptoms were summarized by the sum of individual (fullness, nausea, bloating and pain) symptoms scores 30 min after finishing drinking.…”
Section: Eating Attitude Test (Eat-26)mentioning
confidence: 99%