2021
DOI: 10.1097/qai.0000000000002736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construct and Criterion-Related Validity of the Clinical Frailty Scale in Persons With HIV

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(110 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical challenges of the FFP have been described, and a universally applicable HIV-specific Frailty Index is not available, though adaptations of an Italian Frailty Index for people living with HIV could be used [36]. A Canadian study ( n = 143, 88% men, mean age 57 years) examined the concordance of the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), a 9-point judgement-based tool that evaluates specific domains including comorbidity, function and cognition, and a Frailty Index to the FFP, which showed a prevalence of 15% (CFS 14%; Frailty Index 26%), recommending the CFS because of its ease of use and lack of need for additional measurements, though it is only validated in those over 65 years [11,37 ▪▪ ]. A second Canadian study ( n = 101, 80% male, median age 56 years) utilized the Rotterdam Healthy Ageing Score (HAS) with only 39% of participants considered to be ageing healthily [38,39].…”
Section: Diagnostic Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical challenges of the FFP have been described, and a universally applicable HIV-specific Frailty Index is not available, though adaptations of an Italian Frailty Index for people living with HIV could be used [36]. A Canadian study ( n = 143, 88% men, mean age 57 years) examined the concordance of the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), a 9-point judgement-based tool that evaluates specific domains including comorbidity, function and cognition, and a Frailty Index to the FFP, which showed a prevalence of 15% (CFS 14%; Frailty Index 26%), recommending the CFS because of its ease of use and lack of need for additional measurements, though it is only validated in those over 65 years [11,37 ▪▪ ]. A second Canadian study ( n = 101, 80% male, median age 56 years) utilized the Rotterdam Healthy Ageing Score (HAS) with only 39% of participants considered to be ageing healthily [38,39].…”
Section: Diagnostic Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…phenotype validity but is an important feature of the measure (Kim et al, 2020;McMillan et al, 2021;Van der Elst et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This consistency is important to confirm because future studies may focus on specific population subgroups for certain research questions. This is also a new approach that has not been done in other studies evaluating phenotype validity but is an important feature of the measure (Kim et al, 2020; McMillan et al, 2021; Van der Elst et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These models were adjusted for demographic characteristics, ART use, and time-updated CD4 cell count. We stratified these models into 4 groups defined by sex and baseline age (dichotomized at 50 years, as is common in frailty studies among PWH 19,51 ) to evaluate sex-specific and age-specific associations and understand whether differences observed in studies among the general population persist among PWH. 28,29 We conducted multiple sensitivity analyses, including assessing for interactions with smoking by age and sex (see Methods S1 in Appendix, Supplemental Digital Content, http:// links.lww.com/QAI/C80) and adjusting for baseline alcohol and drug use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%