2015
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints on Type IIn supernova progenitor outbursts from the Lick Observatory Supernova Search

Abstract: We searched through roughly 12 years of archival survey data acquired by the Katzman Automatic Imaging Telescope (KAIT) as part of the Lick Observatory Supernova Search (LOSS) in order to detect or place limits on possible progenitor outbursts of Type IIn supernovae (SNe IIn). The KAIT database contains multiple pre-SN images for 5 SNe IIn (plus one ambiguous case of a SN IIn/imposter) within 50 Mpc. No progenitor outbursts are found using the false discovery rate (FDR) statistical method in any of our targets… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This evidence can come in the form of direct detections of pre-SN outbursts (e.g., Foley et al 2007Foley et al , 2011Pastorello et al 2007Pastorello et al , 2013Smith et al 2010;Mauerhan et al 2013) or inferred from the dense CSM needed to explain SN light curves (e.g., Ofek et al 2007;Smith & McCray 2007;Smith et al , 2008Fransson et al 2014). Although how common such eruptions are is still being investigated (see Ofek et al 2014;Bilinski et al 2015), our work may indicate that SNe IIL are just lower mass versions of these. It is interesting to note that the time of the wind t wind given in Table 1 is comparable to the duration of the carbon shell burning for an M M 12 ZAMS =  star (see Fuller et al 2015).…”
Section: Source Of the Csmmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This evidence can come in the form of direct detections of pre-SN outbursts (e.g., Foley et al 2007Foley et al , 2011Pastorello et al 2007Pastorello et al , 2013Smith et al 2010;Mauerhan et al 2013) or inferred from the dense CSM needed to explain SN light curves (e.g., Ofek et al 2007;Smith & McCray 2007;Smith et al , 2008Fransson et al 2014). Although how common such eruptions are is still being investigated (see Ofek et al 2014;Bilinski et al 2015), our work may indicate that SNe IIL are just lower mass versions of these. It is interesting to note that the time of the wind t wind given in Table 1 is comparable to the duration of the carbon shell burning for an M M 12 ZAMS =  star (see Fuller et al 2015).…”
Section: Source Of the Csmmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…These correlations are expected if the precursors are mass ejection events, and the early-time light curve of these SNe is powered by interaction of the SN ejecta with optically thick CSM. No precursors were found in a similar search among five SNe IIn that was recently reported by Bilinski et al (2015). They do not provide the absolutemagnitude-dependent search time of their sample, so direct comparison of the two surveys is not straightforward.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The new astronomical surveys planned, or already in operation, will provide photometry of SNe IIn allowing further tests of the light curve property correlations found or rejected in this study. The new surveys will also allow more precursor outbursts (Ofek et al 2014c;Bilinski et al 2015) to be discovered, opening new windows to the last years of the SNe IIn progenitor stars. The Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%