2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2018.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints on the Neogene growth of the central Patagonian Andes at the latitude of the Chile triple junction (45–47°S) using U/Pb geochronology in synorogenic strata

Abstract: Constraints on the Neogene growth of the central Patagonian Andes at the latitude of the Chile triple junction (45-47°S) using U/Pb geochronology in synorogenic strata. Tecto (2018),

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
26
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Two orogenic stages, a late Early Cretaceous to early Paleogene stage and a middle Miocene to Pliocene stage, have been recognized in the Patagonian Cordillera, the Patagonian Precordillera ( Fig. 1A; also named the Precordilleran system, or the Eastern Precordillera, or the North Patagonian fold and thrust belt; e.g., Bilmes et al, 2013;Folguera et al, 2018;Orts et al, 2015;Ramos et al, 2014), and the socalled broken foreland generated by the uplift of basement blocks related to the contractional reactivation of older crustal discontinuities and the deformation of former graben/half graben systems (Echaurren et al, 2016;López et al, 2019). These latter were formed in the context of Early Jurassic to Early Cretaceous extension associated with a protracted slab rollback, which is coherent with the westward shift of arc magmatism (Ramos, 1999(Ramos, , 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two orogenic stages, a late Early Cretaceous to early Paleogene stage and a middle Miocene to Pliocene stage, have been recognized in the Patagonian Cordillera, the Patagonian Precordillera ( Fig. 1A; also named the Precordilleran system, or the Eastern Precordillera, or the North Patagonian fold and thrust belt; e.g., Bilmes et al, 2013;Folguera et al, 2018;Orts et al, 2015;Ramos et al, 2014), and the socalled broken foreland generated by the uplift of basement blocks related to the contractional reactivation of older crustal discontinuities and the deformation of former graben/half graben systems (Echaurren et al, 2016;López et al, 2019). These latter were formed in the context of Early Jurassic to Early Cretaceous extension associated with a protracted slab rollback, which is coherent with the westward shift of arc magmatism (Ramos, 1999(Ramos, , 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Andean history of the North Patagonian region involved the development of a foldthrust belt (Giacosa and Heredia, 2004;Giacosa et al, 2005;García Morabito and Ramos, 2012), structural partitioning of the adjacent foreland basin (Bilmes et al, 2013;Gianni et al, 2015;Echaurren et al, 2016;Savignano et al, 2016;Franzese et al, 2018), and evolution of the magmatic arc linked to variations in slab dip (Pankhurst et al, 1999;Suárez and de la Cruz, 2001; Folguera and Ramos, 2011;Echaurren et al, 2016Echaurren et al, , 2017Gianni et al, 2018;Folguera et al, 2018aFolguera et al, , 2018bFernández Paz et al, 2018). However, most of the prevailing tectonic models have been proposed on the basis of structural and magmatic records, with limited information regarding sedimentary basin dynamics (i.e., timing of deposition, duration of stratigraphic hiatuses, and potential shifts in sedimentary provenance).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cenozoic growth of the North Patagonian Andes between 45° S and 47° S has been recently addressed by Folguera et al (2018a). During this Era, they identified a discrete pulse of contraction at ca.…”
Section: Age Constraints On the Metamorphism Of The Traiguén Formatiomentioning
confidence: 99%