2005
DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.76.6.772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints on the Location of the Late Quaternary Reelfoot and New Madrid North Faults in the Northern New Madrid Seismic Zone, Central United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This interpretation is supported by the basin in the Western Lowlands that is bound by the Axial and Western Margin faults and downto-the-southeast displacement on the Western Rift Margin fault near Jonesboro, Arkansas (Van Arsdale et al, 1995) and near New Madrid, Missouri (Baldwin et al, 2005). The New Madrid seismic zone has been explained as being caused by right-lateral shear along the Axial fault and the Western Margin fault north of New Madrid, Missouri, with a left-stepping compressional stepover being the Reelfoot fault.…”
Section: Reelfoot Rift Faults Projected To the Pliocene-pleistocene Umentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This interpretation is supported by the basin in the Western Lowlands that is bound by the Axial and Western Margin faults and downto-the-southeast displacement on the Western Rift Margin fault near Jonesboro, Arkansas (Van Arsdale et al, 1995) and near New Madrid, Missouri (Baldwin et al, 2005). The New Madrid seismic zone has been explained as being caused by right-lateral shear along the Axial fault and the Western Margin fault north of New Madrid, Missouri, with a left-stepping compressional stepover being the Reelfoot fault.…”
Section: Reelfoot Rift Faults Projected To the Pliocene-pleistocene Umentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the Mississippi Embayment, SH-wave methods have been tested at numerous sites, mostly in support of earthquake hazard investigations (Cox et al, 2006(Cox et al, , 2001(Cox et al, , 2000Harris and Sorrells, 2006;Baldwin et al, 2005Baldwin et al, , 2002Woolery et al, 1999Woolery et al, , 1996Woolery et al, , 1993Harris et al, 1998). Figure 2 shows representative field data (from Memphis, Tennessee and Paducah, Kentucky) exhibiting the range of depths (<10 m to >100 m) imaged by hammer-impact, SH-wave reflection methods in the Mississippi Embayment.…”
Section: Basis For Use Of Sh-wave Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although P-wave (compressional wave) reflection methods have been used for 30 years for imaging faults in the Paleozoic through Tertiary deposits of the Mississippi Embayment (e.g., Stephenson et al, 1999;Williams et al, 1995;Schweig et al, 1992;Sexton and Jones, 1986;Zoback, 1979), only in the last two decades has detailed seismic investigation of deformed Quaternary sediments, primarily using S-wave (shear wave) methods, been undertaken (e.g., Cox et al, 2006Cox et al, , 2001Cox et al, , 2000Harris and Sorrells, 2006;Baldwin et al, 2005Baldwin et al, , 2002Woolery et al, 1999Woolery et al, , 1996Woolery et al, , 1993Harris et al, 1998). One of the principal justifications for using S-waves is the potential for increased seismic resolution (compared with conventional Pwave methods) in the water-saturated, shallow sediments of the Mississippi Embayment-an important consideration in light of the modest surface deformation in the region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common methods used to investigate shallow subsurface deformation in the NMSZ include paleoseismologic trenching, shallow coring, and seismic reflection (e.g., Baldwin et al, 2005)-most recently using S-waves (Harris, 2009). …”
Section: Figure 1 S-wave Field Record (Walkaway Test) From the Lowermentioning
confidence: 99%