2006
DOI: 10.3133/pp1709f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints on the age and provenance of the Chugach accretionary complex from detrital zircons in the Sitka Graywacke near Sitka, Alaska

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyses interpreted to reflect metamorphic zircon growth were not included in probability plots and are shown in a lighter color. Data sources for reference strata: Gravina basin [ Kapp and Gehrels , ; Gehrels , ; Tochilin et al ., ; Yokelson et al , ], Bowser basin [ Evenchick et al ., ], Chugach accretionary complex [ Haeussler et al ., ; Amato and Pavlis , ; Garver and Davidson , ], and limited data from two detrital samples from the lower Hazelton Group with unimodal U‐Pb zircon age populations [ Cutts et al ., ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Analyses interpreted to reflect metamorphic zircon growth were not included in probability plots and are shown in a lighter color. Data sources for reference strata: Gravina basin [ Kapp and Gehrels , ; Gehrels , ; Tochilin et al ., ; Yokelson et al , ], Bowser basin [ Evenchick et al ., ], Chugach accretionary complex [ Haeussler et al ., ; Amato and Pavlis , ; Garver and Davidson , ], and limited data from two detrital samples from the lower Hazelton Group with unimodal U‐Pb zircon age populations [ Cutts et al ., ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our samples lack abundant Triassic dates that dominate DZ populations from the Bowser/Sustut retroarc basin [ Evenchick et al ., ] and have maximum depositional ages younger than Upper Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous sediments of the Gravina belt [ McClelland et al ., ; Kapp and Gehrels , ] (Figure ). Upper Cretaceous rocks of the southern Chugach accretionary complex, currently northwest of the Central Gneiss Complex, were derived from the Coast Mountains batholith, contain major age peaks that closely match our DZ populations, and are dominated in some samples by populations of Late Cretaceous ages very close to the depositional ages of the samples (Valdez Group) [ Haeussler et al ., ; Amato and Pavlis , ; Amato et al ., ; Kochelek et al ., ; Garver and Davidson , ]. Thus, partial underthrusting of accretionary complex rocks [ Ducea et al ., ], relamination of sediment at the plate interface [ Behn et al ., ; Hacker et al ., ], or intraarc burial may also be a viable hypothesis for the burial of these rocks beneath the Coast Mountains batholith.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparison of U‐Pb ages and Hf isotope values of detrital zircons from the Gravina belt (this study) with reference fields for detrital zircons from the Alexander terrane in SE Alaska (C. White, written communication, 2015; n = 2288), the Yukon‐Tanana (M. Pecha, written communication, 2015), and Taku (D. Giesler, written communication, 2015) terranes ( n = 2761), detrital zircons from the Chugach terrane [ Haeussler et al ., ; Amato and Pavlis , ; Garver and Davidson , ] ( n = 1968) and plutons of the eastern (inboard) and western (outboard) segments of the CMB [ Cecil et al ., ]. Note that age‐distribution curves have variable exaggeration of >800 Ma ages.…”
Section: U‐pb Geochronologic and Hf Isotope Geochemical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even with transform offsets, the possible plate geometry is limited for any Kula‐Farallon ridge interaction with North America using the updated plate motion models of Doubrovine and Tarduno [2008] and Müller et al [2008] (Figure 7a). With these updated models, we reproduce possible plate geometries based on the Alaska‐British Columbia border velocity diagram (Figure 6d), since several provenance studies indicate the Coast Mountains as a source for the Chugach terrane accretionary prism material [e.g., Plafker et al , 1994; Haeussler et al , 2004; Kochelek et al , 2011]. Figure 7shows the two end‐member arrangements of ridge and transform segments to accommodate 350 km of triple junction migration in 2 m.y.…”
Section: Plate Velocity Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%