2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.121.221301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves Using Planck , WMAP, and New BICEP2/ Keck Observations through the 2015 Season

Abstract: We present results from an analysis of all data taken by the BICEP2/Keck CMB polarization experiments up to and including the 2015 observing season. This includes the first Keck Array observations at 220 GHz and additional observations at 95 & 150 GHz. The Q/U maps reach depths of 5.2, 2.9 and 26 µKcmb arcmin at 95, 150 and 220 GHz respectively over an effective area of ≈ 400 square degrees. The 220 GHz maps achieve a signal-to-noise on polarized dust emission approximately equal to that of Planck at 353 GHz. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
349
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 468 publications
(371 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
21
349
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth mentioning that all the values of α, presented in the above table, together with the values of β and λ, produce a power spectrum P s ∼ 10 −9 , close to its observed value. The results are well within the allowed region of n s and r from the Planck2018 collaboration [14] (see also [15]), which is n s = (0.9607, 0.9691), 1σ region (0.9565, 0.9733), 2σ region , r < 0.064. (4.8)…”
Section: (47)supporting
confidence: 79%
“…It is worth mentioning that all the values of α, presented in the above table, together with the values of β and λ, produce a power spectrum P s ∼ 10 −9 , close to its observed value. The results are well within the allowed region of n s and r from the Planck2018 collaboration [14] (see also [15]), which is n s = (0.9607, 0.9691), 1σ region (0.9565, 0.9733), 2σ region , r < 0.064. (4.8)…”
Section: (47)supporting
confidence: 79%
“…As a result, the Higgs potential in the Einstein frame develops a plateau suitable for slow-roll inflation. The predictions of the model are in perfect agreement with the current observational data from the Planck mission [20][21][22], and the model has also been invoked in unified frameworks like the SMASH model [55]. However, the original Higgs inflation model [56] predicts a scale of inflation H * 10 13 GeV which, due to the bound on CDM isocurvature perturbations, does not allow the axion to constitute all of the observed CDM [23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…so that in case of large α, the scenario yields negligible primordial gravitation waves. The Planck and BICEP2/Keck Array limits for the aforementioned observables are [7,63] A s = 2.1 × 10 −9 , n s = 0.9625 ± 0.0048 , r < 0.06 , (2.12) measured at the pivot scale k = 0.05 Mpc −1 . In this paper, we will show by studying few example potentials that the slow-roll solution is still an attractor in the presence of the nonminimal kinetic terms, so the results (2.9) and (2.11) are general and practically independent of the initial conditions.…”
Section: Cosmic Inflationmentioning
confidence: 99%