Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.99.032009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints on millicharged particles with low-threshold germanium detectors at Kuo-Sheng Reactor Neutrino Laboratory

Abstract: Relativistic millicharged particles (χq) have been proposed in various extensions to the Standard Model of particle physics. We consider the scenarios where they are produced at nuclear reactor core and via interactions of cosmic-rays with the earth's atmosphere. Millicharged particles could also be candidates for dark matter, and become relativistic through acceleration by supernova explosion shock waves. The atomic ionization cross section of χq with matter are derived with the equivalent photon approximatio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strongest upper limit on the millicharge neutrino is Q ν ≤ 2 × 10 −15 e from the time arrival dispersion and the energy spread of neutrinos from SN1987A [30]. The laboratory bounds from the ν − e are also several orders of magnitude smaller in size than the bounds of this study [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. For instance, the TEXONO experiment derives the limit, Q ν ≤ 2.1 × 10 −12 e. However, this difference can be easily understood from the kinematical considerations discussed in this work, while as it was shown here, the robustness of the bounds totally depends on the experimental details.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The strongest upper limit on the millicharge neutrino is Q ν ≤ 2 × 10 −15 e from the time arrival dispersion and the energy spread of neutrinos from SN1987A [30]. The laboratory bounds from the ν − e are also several orders of magnitude smaller in size than the bounds of this study [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. For instance, the TEXONO experiment derives the limit, Q ν ≤ 2.1 × 10 −12 e. However, this difference can be easily understood from the kinematical considerations discussed in this work, while as it was shown here, the robustness of the bounds totally depends on the experimental details.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…From the theoretical considerations, there is no upper limit available on the millicharge neutrinos. All the known limits are experimental [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] or observational [30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At higher energies, they provide the ability to differentiate single-site from multiple-site interactions [12]. As a result, they have found applications in dark matter searches [15,16], neutrinoless double-beta decay experiments [17][18][19], ongoing attempts at CEνNS detection [6,[20][21][22], and exotic decays [23]. A compact detector profile, illustrated by this work, allows to envision their use as eminently-fieldable reactor monitoring devices with nuclear non-proliferation applications [24,25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Data taken with the nPCGe detector have been adopted to place constraints on milli-charged neutrino [21] and dark matter cosmic ray [22], as well as heavy sterile neutrinos as dark matter [13]. The data presented in this article were acquired over 628.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%