Abstract:Using the absolute ages of passively evolving galaxies observed at different redshifts, one can obtain the differential ages, the derivative of redshift z with respect to the cosmic time t (i.e. dz/dt). Thus, the Hubble parameter H(z) can be measured through the relation H(z) = −(dz/dt)/(1 + z). By comparing the measured Hubble parameter at different redshifts with the theoretical one containing free cosmological parameters, one can constrain current cosmological models. In this paper, we use this method to pr… Show more
“…In [572], Yi and Zhang tested the HDE model by using the H(z) data and the LT data. They also verified that the HDE behaves like a quintom-type at 1σ…”
“…In [572], Yi and Zhang tested the HDE model by using the H(z) data and the LT data. They also verified that the HDE behaves like a quintom-type at 1σ…”
“…Here the observed Hubble data H (z i ) and H (z j ) are uncorrelated, for they are obtained by the observations of galaxies at different redshift. Using these nine observational Hubble data one can constrain DE models by minimizing [59][60][61][62][63][64] …”
Section: Constraint On Gcg Model Parametermentioning
We investigate observational constraints on the generalized Chaplygin gas (GCG) model as the unification of dark matter and dark energy from the latest observational data: the Union SNe Ia data, the observational Hubble data, the SDSS baryon acoustic peak and the fiveyear WMAP shift parameter. The result is obtained that the best-fit values of the GCG model parameters with their confidence level are A s = 0.73 (2σ ). Furthermore, in this model, we can see that the evolution of equation of state (EOS) for dark energy is similar to quiessence, and its current best-fit value is w 0de = −0.96 with the 1σ confidence level −0.91 ≥ w 0de ≥ −1.00.
“…40 These OHD data were also used to constrain the parameters of cosmological models 41,42 and some other relevant works. [43][44][45][46][47] For example, Wei & Zhang(2007a) compared the 9 observational H(z) data with some cosmological models with/without interaction between dark energy and dust matter and found that the OHD data with fairly large errors cannot severely constrain model parameters alone.…”
In order to test if there is energy transfer between dark energy and dark matter, we investigate cosmological constraints on two forms of nontrivial interaction between the dark matter sector and the sector responsible for the acceleration of the universe, in light of the newly revised observations including OHD, CMB, BAO and SNe Ia. More precisely, we find the same tendencies for both phenomenological forms of the interaction term Q = 3γHρ, i.e., the parameter γ to be a small number, |γ| ≈ 10 −2 . However, concerning the sign of the interaction parameter, we observe that γ > 0 when the interaction between dark sectors is proportional to the energy density of dust matter, whereas the negative coupling (γ < 0) is preferred by observations when the interaction term is proportional to dark energy density. We further discuss two possible explanations to this incompatibility and apply a quantitative criteria to judge the severity of the coincidence problem. Results suggest that the γmIDE model with a positive coupling may alleviate the coincidence problem, since its coincidence index C is smaller than that for the γ d IDE model, the interacting quintessence and phantom models by four orders of magnitude.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.