2021
DOI: 10.1029/2020gc009594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints on Element Mobility During Deformation Within the Seismogenic Zone, Shimanto Belt, Japan

Abstract: Subduction interfaces exhibit a variety of slip behaviors, including megathrust and slow earthquakes. Field observations are consistent with crack‐seal deformation, in which tensile cracks are sealed by fluid‐transported solute. However, there are few constraints on the mass fluxes and length and time scales of such deformation and attendant increases in cohesion within the seismogenic zone. Here, we present a systematic geochemical investigation of mass transport associated with development of crack‐seal vein… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6B), which is consistent with slip dissolution, compactive strain, and volume loss in mudstones (Ramirez et al, 2021). Increasing temperature within the underthrusting sediment pile, from ~150-300 °C, is depicted in X-ray diffraction patterns of mudstones by a prograde decrease in the proportion of smectite, changes in the proportion of illite polytypes, and the increasing abundance of chlorite (Ramirez et al, 2021). These observations show that noncoaxial strain in subduction mélange is accomplished through a combination of quartz and feldspar dissolution and metamorphic equilibration of phyllosilicates.…”
Section: Microstructures: What Are the Dominant Deformation Mechanisms?supporting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…6B), which is consistent with slip dissolution, compactive strain, and volume loss in mudstones (Ramirez et al, 2021). Increasing temperature within the underthrusting sediment pile, from ~150-300 °C, is depicted in X-ray diffraction patterns of mudstones by a prograde decrease in the proportion of smectite, changes in the proportion of illite polytypes, and the increasing abundance of chlorite (Ramirez et al, 2021). These observations show that noncoaxial strain in subduction mélange is accomplished through a combination of quartz and feldspar dissolution and metamorphic equilibration of phyllosilicates.…”
Section: Microstructures: What Are the Dominant Deformation Mechanisms?supporting
confidence: 74%
“…earth elements (REEs), high field strength elements (HFSE), and Ti (Fig. 6B), which is consistent with slip dissolution, compactive strain, and volume loss in mudstones (Ramirez et al, 2021). Increasing temperature within the underthrusting sediment pile, from ~150-300 °C, is depicted in X-ray diffraction patterns of mudstones by a prograde decrease in the proportion of smectite, changes in the proportion of illite polytypes, and the increasing abundance of chlorite (Ramirez et al, 2021).…”
Section: Microstructures: What Are the Dominant Deformation Mechanisms?supporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Microstructural observations from HPLT rocks imply that dissolution‐precipitation creep (DPC) also plays an important role in deformation of quartz‐rich rocks of the subduction interface (e.g., Behr & Bürgmann, 2021; Condit et al., 2022; Wassmann & Stöckhert, 2013b). Unequivocal evidence for DPC includes truncated intracrystalline chemical zonation (e.g., Wassmann & Stöckhert, 2013a), dissolution seams that are enriched in insoluble components (e.g., Ramirez et al., 2021) and the development of textural fabrics that indicate mineral growth into an open fluid‐filled cavity (e.g., Fletcher, 1977). We investigate DPC using the thin‐film model (Rutter, 1976; Weyl, 1959) which has the form trueε̇=τ()FVsρfSRΘρsD00.25emexp()EdRΘ()wd3, $\dot{\varepsilon }=\tau \left(\frac{F{V}_{s}{\rho }_{f}S}{R{\Theta}{\rho }_{s}}\right){D}_{0}\,\mathrm{exp}\left(\frac{-{E}_{d}}{R{\Theta}}\right)\left(\frac{w}{{d}^{3}}\right),$ with the variables as defined in Table 1.…”
Section: Strength Of the Subduction Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%