2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2015.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints on deformation of the Southern Andes since the Cretaceous from anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore use anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) as a complementary tool to our detailed field kinematic analysis and interpret the results on structural grounds. AMS is in fact a powerful tool for petrofabric analyses that may be used to characterize the regional strain evolution in deformed terranes [ Jelinek , ; Jelínek and Kropáček , ; Hrouda , ; Borradaile , , ; Jackson , ; Jackson and Tauxe , ; Rochette et al , ; Tarling and Hrouda , ; Parés and van der Pluijm , ; Soto et al , ; Maffione et al , ]. With AMS, rock samples can be measured more comprehensively, quickly, and reproducibly than with any other petrofabric technique.…”
Section: Anisotropy Of Magnetic Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore use anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) as a complementary tool to our detailed field kinematic analysis and interpret the results on structural grounds. AMS is in fact a powerful tool for petrofabric analyses that may be used to characterize the regional strain evolution in deformed terranes [ Jelinek , ; Jelínek and Kropáček , ; Hrouda , ; Borradaile , , ; Jackson , ; Jackson and Tauxe , ; Rochette et al , ; Tarling and Hrouda , ; Parés and van der Pluijm , ; Soto et al , ; Maffione et al , ]. With AMS, rock samples can be measured more comprehensively, quickly, and reproducibly than with any other petrofabric technique.…”
Section: Anisotropy Of Magnetic Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AMS method, as has been demonstrated by Hrouda & Janak (1976) and Lee & Angelier (2000), is capable of detecting tectonic strains ranging from those only weakly through to those ductily imposed in deformed rocks. Magnetic fabric studies have also been applied to better understand a number of fold-and-thrust belts (Saint-Bezar et al 2002;Louis et al 2006;Robion et al 2007;Vasiliev et al 2009;Weil & Yonkee 2009;Maffione et al 2015). In this study, the HornsundÁSørkapp area in the southern part of the WSFTB was selected for the first time as a target for AMS investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) The AMS ellipsoid is transformed from oblate to triaxial (i.e., K max ≈ K int ≈ K min ) when it experiences a weak strain. Although K min remains perpendicular to the bedding and is concentrated in the projection center, K max tends to have a clustered distribution perpendicular to the direction of the compression (Larrasoaña et al, 2004;Parés, 2004. (3) As the strain increases, the AMS ellipsoid ultimately becomes prolate (i.e., K max ≫ K int ≈ K min ), K min values begin to deviate from the center of the projection plane and spread out along the direction of the strain and K max values become more tightly clustered (Borradaile, 2001;Maffione et al, 2015;Soto et al, 2009;Tang et al, 2012).…”
Section: 1029/2018gc007944mentioning
confidence: 99%