2012
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/03/016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints on cosmological models from strong gravitational lensing systems

Abstract: Strong lensing has developed into an important astrophysical tool for probing both cosmology and galaxies (their structure, formation, and evolution). Using the gravitational lensing theory and cluster mass distribution model, we try to collect a relatively complete observational data concerning the Hubble constant independent ratio between two angular diameter distances D ds /D s from various large systematic gravitational lens surveys and lensing by galaxy clusters combined with X-ray observations, and check… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
125
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
10
125
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In what concern to data manipulation, and following [29], we selected 59 strong lens systems from the Sloan Lens ACS Survey (SLACS, [51]) and the Lens Structure and Dynamic survey (LSD, [43,44]), and 11 from CfA-Arizona Space Telescope LEns Survey [72]. SLACS systems where selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) based on the presence of absorption-dominated galaxy continuum at one redshift and emission lines at another higher redshift ( [50]).…”
Section: The Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In what concern to data manipulation, and following [29], we selected 59 strong lens systems from the Sloan Lens ACS Survey (SLACS, [51]) and the Lens Structure and Dynamic survey (LSD, [43,44]), and 11 from CfA-Arizona Space Telescope LEns Survey [72]. SLACS systems where selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) based on the presence of absorption-dominated galaxy continuum at one redshift and emission lines at another higher redshift ( [50]).…”
Section: The Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of [29] and [78] have used a SIS model and an extra factor f E to account for: (i) systematical errors in the observed velocity dispersion, (ii) differences between θ E obtained from SIS and SIE and image separation.…”
Section: The Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where θ E is the Einstein radius, σ c is the central velocity dispersion of the lensing galaxy , c is the speed of light and f is a phenomenological coefficient which includes several systematic errors caused by: the difference between the observed stellar velocity dispersion and that of the SIS model, the assumption of SIS model in calculating the theoretical Einstein radius, and the softened isothermal sphere potentials (Ofek et al 2003;Cao et al 2012). For the standard SIS model, the coefficient parameter reduces to f = 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Θ is the vector of the parameters of the cosmological model [16]. Here, we use a sample of 80 strong lensing systems by [10] which contains 70 data points from SLACS and LSD and 10 data points from galaxy clusters.…”
Section: Gravitational Lensingmentioning
confidence: 99%