2017
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/03/024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints on cosmic ray and PeV neutrino production in blazars

Abstract: IceCube has detected a cumulative flux of PeV neutrinos, which origin is unknown. Blazars, active galactic nuclei with relativistic jets pointing to us, are long and widely expected to be one of the strong candidates of high energy neutrino sources. The neutrino production depends strongly on the cosmic ray power of blazar jets, which is largely unknown. The recent null results in stacking searches of neutrinos for several blazar samples by IceCube put upper limits on the neutrino fluxes from these blazars. He… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scenario 1: Constant baryonic loading: We assume a constant baryonic loading ξ( ) = ξ for all sources, as in Zhang & Li (2017); Scenario 2: Constant ratio L ν /L γ : We assume that the ratio between neutrino luminosity and γ-ray luminosity is constant, i.e., L ν /L γ ≡ K = const. This assumption is model-independent and has been used in previous works, such as Kadler et al (2016); Righi et al (2017); Halzen & Kheirandish (2016); Wang & Li (2016) to evaluate the flux of neutrinos from BL Lacs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scenario 1: Constant baryonic loading: We assume a constant baryonic loading ξ( ) = ξ for all sources, as in Zhang & Li (2017); Scenario 2: Constant ratio L ν /L γ : We assume that the ratio between neutrino luminosity and γ-ray luminosity is constant, i.e., L ν /L γ ≡ K = const. This assumption is model-independent and has been used in previous works, such as Kadler et al (2016); Righi et al (2017); Halzen & Kheirandish (2016); Wang & Li (2016) to evaluate the flux of neutrinos from BL Lacs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume a constant baryonic loading ξ( ) =ξ for all sources, as in Zhang & Li (2017); 2015)), the green line represents the flux of throughgoing muons (x3, Aartsen et al (2016)) and the red line represents the current IceCube blazar stacking limit (Aartsen et al 2017b). The shaded yellow and cyan regions denote the contribution of BL Lacs and FSRQs, respectively, to the total flux of neutrinos, whereas the dotted yellow and cyan curves denote the contribution from resolved sources only.…”
Section: Scenario 1: Constant Baryonic Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter ξ pγ actually accounts how much fraction of proton's energy carried by pions in the process. For UHE protons with energies ∼ 0.1 EeV, the pγ process is dominant one over the pp process [31].…”
Section: A Proton and Neutrino Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have checked that our results do not depend on the particular blazar model considered. Therefore, in the following we just use as a benchmark the "scenario 1" (see Figure 5 in (Palladino et al 2019b)) where the baryonic loading is assumed to be constant (see also Zhang & Li (2017)). In any case, as will be clear in the following, we check that in our best-fit scenarios the blazar neutrino component is always compatible with the IceCube stacking limit (Aartsen et al 2017b).…”
Section: Multi-messenger Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%