Constraints and Approaches for Distributed Mobile AD-HOC Network Security

Abstract

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to

An Energy Efficient Data Secrecy Scheme For Wireless Body Sensor Networks

“…This simplifying assumption was verified by Yee Wei Law et al in [17]. For the energy cost of SHA-1 algorithm, we use the implementation results of Patrick W. Fitzgibbons et al [10]. They implemented SHA-1 on WINS node.…”

“…Also, the energy costs of both the Kerberos and ECDH-ECDSA on MICAz as well as TelosB nodes are analyzed. Patrick W. Fitzgibbons et al [10] investigated the implementation of existing typical protocol (such as Kerberos) on resource-restrained sensor nodes. The energy of related protocols is evaluated on several exiting sensor motes.…”

“…Our motivation for using this specific sensor node is twofold. First, we wanted to use the same node as the authors of [10] so that we can directly compare the results. The second reason for choosing the WINS node is because this kind of sensor mote has been applied to perform monitor and control for health care.…”

“…And we also assume that the node platform is WINS node. For the SHA-1 and AES algorithm, we use the implementation results in [10]. In PIKE scheme [8], twelve AES operations as well as twelve SHA-1 operations have to be carried out.…”

“…In addition, we choose Kerberos, Just-Vaudenary and Otway-Rees as the representatives of general protocols for comparison. Patrick W. Fitzgibbons et al [10] implemented these general protocols on WINS node. The comparison between our protocol and above related protocols is shown in Fig.…”