Abstract:One of the most important policies adopted in inventory control is the replenishment cycle policy. Such a policy provides an effective means of damping planning instability and coping with demand uncertainty. In this paper we develop a constraint programming approach able to compute optimal replenishment cycle policy parameters under non-stationary stochastic demand, ordering, holding and shortage costs. We show how in our model it is possible to exploit the convexity of the cost-function during the search to … Show more
“…The model presented can be used to compute an upper bound for E[TP] -note that underestimating buffer stocks, i.e.Ĩ lb t leads to lower holding costs and to an overestimation of the expected order quantity and associated margins mQ t in the objective function. If we aim to compute a lower bound instead, all occurrences of I lb t should be replaced byĨ ub t and constraints (22) should be replaced by constraints (23). Other MILP formulations under β cyc and β service levels are obtained in a similar fashion, since only the service level constraints of the model are affected by this change.…”
In this paper, we develop mixed integer linear programming models to compute near-optimal policy parameters for the non-stationary stochastic lot sizing problem under Bookbinder and Tan's static-dynamic uncertainty strategy. Our models build on piecewise linear upper and lower bounds of the first order loss function. We discuss different formulations of the stochastic lot sizing problem, in which the quality of service is captured by means of backorder penalty costs, non-stockout probability, or fill rate constraints. These models can be easily adapted to operate in settings in which unmet demand is backordered or lost. The proposed approach has a number of advantages with respect to existing methods in the literature: it enables seamless modelling of different variants of the above problem, which have been previously tackled via ad-hoc solution methods; and it produces an accurate estimation of the expected total cost, expressed in terms of upper and lower bounds. Our computational study demonstrates the effectiveness and flexibility of our models.
“…The model presented can be used to compute an upper bound for E[TP] -note that underestimating buffer stocks, i.e.Ĩ lb t leads to lower holding costs and to an overestimation of the expected order quantity and associated margins mQ t in the objective function. If we aim to compute a lower bound instead, all occurrences of I lb t should be replaced byĨ ub t and constraints (22) should be replaced by constraints (23). Other MILP formulations under β cyc and β service levels are obtained in a similar fashion, since only the service level constraints of the model are affected by this change.…”
In this paper, we develop mixed integer linear programming models to compute near-optimal policy parameters for the non-stationary stochastic lot sizing problem under Bookbinder and Tan's static-dynamic uncertainty strategy. Our models build on piecewise linear upper and lower bounds of the first order loss function. We discuss different formulations of the stochastic lot sizing problem, in which the quality of service is captured by means of backorder penalty costs, non-stockout probability, or fill rate constraints. These models can be easily adapted to operate in settings in which unmet demand is backordered or lost. The proposed approach has a number of advantages with respect to existing methods in the literature: it enables seamless modelling of different variants of the above problem, which have been previously tackled via ad-hoc solution methods; and it produces an accurate estimation of the expected total cost, expressed in terms of upper and lower bounds. Our computational study demonstrates the effectiveness and flexibility of our models.
“…However, following earlier results, we regard such occurrences as rare events and ignore the associated costs (see e.g. Rossi et al, 2012).…”
Section: The Generalized (S S) Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy has recently been subject to a detailed scrutiny due to its practical relevance, and applied to a variety of inventory control problems (see e.g. Bookbinder & Tan, 1988;Tarim & Kingsman, 2004Rossi et al, 2012). All of these studies have analyzed the (R, S) policy under the assumption that ordering cost is comprised of a fixed and a linear component.…”
“…Future works may investigate more accurate and structured reliability measures, such as those discussed in Tarim et al [18], in place of the chance constraints discussed in the current model. Another interesting strategy might be to penalize shortages, following Rossi et al [16]. The model is currently positioned at an operational/tactical level.…”
To match products of different quality with end market preferences under supply uncertainty, it is crucial to integrate product quality information in logistics decision making. We present a case of this integration in a meat processing company that faces uncertainty in delivered livestock quality. We develop a stochastic programming model that exploits historical product quality delivery data to produce slaughterhouse allocation plans with reduced levels of uncertainty in received livestock quality. The allocation plans generated by this model fulfill demand for multiple quality features at separate slaughterhouses under prescribed service levels while minimizing transportation costs. We test the model on real world problem instances generated from a data set provided by an industrial partner. Results show that historical farmer delivery data can be used to reduce uncertainty in quality of animals to be delivered to slaughterhouses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.