The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-011-0936-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraint programming for stochastic inventory systems under shortage cost

Abstract: One of the most important policies adopted in inventory control is the replenishment cycle policy. Such a policy provides an effective means of damping planning instability and coping with demand uncertainty. In this paper we develop a constraint programming approach able to compute optimal replenishment cycle policy parameters under non-stationary stochastic demand, ordering, holding and shortage costs. We show how in our model it is possible to exploit the convexity of the cost-function during the search to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model presented can be used to compute an upper bound for E[TP] -note that underestimating buffer stocks, i.e.Ĩ lb t leads to lower holding costs and to an overestimation of the expected order quantity and associated margins mQ t in the objective function. If we aim to compute a lower bound instead, all occurrences of I lb t should be replaced byĨ ub t and constraints (22) should be replaced by constraints (23). Other MILP formulations under β cyc and β service levels are obtained in a similar fashion, since only the service level constraints of the model are affected by this change.…”
Section: Lost Salesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model presented can be used to compute an upper bound for E[TP] -note that underestimating buffer stocks, i.e.Ĩ lb t leads to lower holding costs and to an overestimation of the expected order quantity and associated margins mQ t in the objective function. If we aim to compute a lower bound instead, all occurrences of I lb t should be replaced byĨ ub t and constraints (22) should be replaced by constraints (23). Other MILP formulations under β cyc and β service levels are obtained in a similar fashion, since only the service level constraints of the model are affected by this change.…”
Section: Lost Salesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, following earlier results, we regard such occurrences as rare events and ignore the associated costs (see e.g. Rossi et al, 2012).…”
Section: The Generalized (S S) Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy has recently been subject to a detailed scrutiny due to its practical relevance, and applied to a variety of inventory control problems (see e.g. Bookbinder & Tan, 1988;Tarim & Kingsman, 2004Rossi et al, 2012). All of these studies have analyzed the (R, S) policy under the assumption that ordering cost is comprised of a fixed and a linear component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future works may investigate more accurate and structured reliability measures, such as those discussed in Tarim et al [18], in place of the chance constraints discussed in the current model. Another interesting strategy might be to penalize shortages, following Rossi et al [16]. The model is currently positioned at an operational/tactical level.…”
Section: Analysis On Supplier Variancementioning
confidence: 99%