2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.83.024025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraint preserving boundary conditions for the Z4c formulation of general relativity

Abstract: We discuss high order absorbing constraint preserving boundary conditions for the Z4c formulation of general relativity coupled to the moving puncture family of gauges. We are primarily concerned with the constraint preservation and absorption properties of these conditions. In the frozen coefficient approximation, with an appropriate first order pseudo-differential reduction, we show that the constraint subsystem is boundary stable on a four dimensional compact manifold. We analyze the remainder of the initia… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
78
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(109 reference statements)
4
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was also pointed out in [58] that CCZ4 may show instability depending on the value of the damping parameter (we used k 1 = 0.05, k 2 = 0, for k 3 = 1). Our result indicates that a deeper study of the properties of the CCZ4 formulation (and the very similar Z4c formulation [59]) is needed for its use at very low resolution. At the same time, the result that the PPM scheme is less accurate does not come as a surprise, since it is formally a thirdorder method instead of a fifth-order one (like WENO).…”
Section: B Accuracy In the Determination Of Merger Timementioning
confidence: 98%
“…It was also pointed out in [58] that CCZ4 may show instability depending on the value of the damping parameter (we used k 1 = 0.05, k 2 = 0, for k 3 = 1). Our result indicates that a deeper study of the properties of the CCZ4 formulation (and the very similar Z4c formulation [59]) is needed for its use at very low resolution. At the same time, the result that the PPM scheme is less accurate does not come as a surprise, since it is formally a thirdorder method instead of a fifth-order one (like WENO).…”
Section: B Accuracy In the Determination Of Merger Timementioning
confidence: 98%
“…For the first setup, we substitute the outermost level (l = 0) by a multipatch cubed-sphere grid [45,[54][55][56]] on which we do not solve the GRHD equations. The spheres allow us to apply constraint preserving boundary conditions [57]. This 'shell' setup is denoted in Tab.…”
Section: B Evolutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35,94]. We also use the Z4c scheme [53,95] with constraint-preserving boundary conditions [53,96]. The BAM grid setup consists of seven refinement levels.…”
Section: Dynamical Evolutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%