PsycEXTRA Dataset 2012
DOI: 10.1037/e502412013-779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraint on Semantic Flexibility in Visual Statistical Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have suggested that there are constraints on how far statistical learning can be generalized in adults. For example, learning does not transfer from items (e.g., apple–bus) to superordinate categories (e.g., any fruit–any vehicle) (Otsuka et al, 2014; also see Luo & Zhao, 2018). Furthermore, when the test consisted of both the exposed items (having both item‐ and category‐level information) and the novel items from the exposed category (having only category‐level information), adult observers showed a higher sensitivity to items over categories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have suggested that there are constraints on how far statistical learning can be generalized in adults. For example, learning does not transfer from items (e.g., apple–bus) to superordinate categories (e.g., any fruit–any vehicle) (Otsuka et al, 2014; also see Luo & Zhao, 2018). Furthermore, when the test consisted of both the exposed items (having both item‐ and category‐level information) and the novel items from the exposed category (having only category‐level information), adult observers showed a higher sensitivity to items over categories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence of SL has been observed at the level of scene categories [94], although not as reliably for object categories [122].…”
Section: Generalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical visual statistical learning (VSL) experiment consists of familiarization and test phases. In a familiarization phase, participants observe a visual stream consisting of shapes (e.g., Fiser and Aslin 2002;Turk-Browne et al 2005, 2008Turk-Brown and Scholl 2009), letters , objects (e.g., Otsuka et al 2013Otsuka et al , 2014, or natural scenes (e.g., Brady and Oliva 2008;Otsuka et al 2016). The visual stream consists of temporal triplets that three items always appear in the same order across participants (e.g., ABC, DEF, GHI, and JKL; "A" is always followed by "B", which is always followed by "C").…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%