Handbook of Neuroscience for the Behavioral Sciences 2009
DOI: 10.1002/9780470478509.neubb002066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraint‐Induced Movement Therapy: A Paradigm for Translating Advances in Behavioral Neuroscience into Rehabilitation Treatments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
(126 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CIMT and mCIMT are forms of therapy that help stroke victims regain the use of affected limbs (American Stroke Association, 2004)16 ) . For CIMT, the level of evidence varied from level III to level I (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CIMT and mCIMT are forms of therapy that help stroke victims regain the use of affected limbs (American Stroke Association, 2004)16 ) . For CIMT, the level of evidence varied from level III to level I (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practitioners say that stroke victims disabled for many years have recovered the use of their limbs using CIMT. In fact, CIMT therapy is “at the forefront of a revolution” in the field of neuro-rehabilitation in terms of recovery for stroke survivors16 ) . Although there are differences between the two therapies, they both share the concept of incorporating physical constraint of the unaffected limb in order to facilitate use of the paretic limb17 ) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For further details on the various forms of CI therapy including details of their protocols, results, and the nature of the modifications from the basic CI Movement therapy paradigm that enabled its broad application, the reader is referred to recent review articles (Taub and Uswatte, 2009; Uswatte and Taub, 2013) and to the data papers cited.…”
Section: Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patients in the first CI therapy study 1 and in the early replications 3,1416 had upper extremity motor deficits that could be characterized as mild/moderate (Grade 2 according to the categorization scheme employed here; see Table 1). A subsequent multi-site randomized clinical trial with a positive outcome 4 employed patients with mild/moderate and moderate motor deficits (Grades 2 and 3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%