2015 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icstw.2015.7107441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraint handling in combinatorial test generation using forbidden tuples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is explained by the fact that our base algorithm always has to compute the best parameters and values to fix, although this effort often results in a smaller test suite. Hence, we could only observe in some industry examples that the minimum forbidden tuple computation of Yu et al [38] may become a significant overhead. We leave it for future work to implement our constraint handling approach in the IPOG algorithm to fairly compare our constraint handling and the minimum forbidden tuple approach.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This is explained by the fact that our base algorithm always has to compute the best parameters and values to fix, although this effort often results in a smaller test suite. Hence, we could only observe in some industry examples that the minimum forbidden tuple computation of Yu et al [38] may become a significant overhead. We leave it for future work to implement our constraint handling approach in the IPOG algorithm to fairly compare our constraint handling and the minimum forbidden tuple approach.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There is substantial work on combinatorial testing taking constraints and forbidden tuples into account, including meta-heuristic approaches [10,17,20,27], SAT-based approaches [29,36], and greedy approaches, which is further categorized into one-test-at-a-time (OTAT) approaches [9,11,10] and in-parameter-order generalized (IPOG) approaches [37,38].…”
Section: Mac Does Not Support Amd Cpusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations