2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraint-following control design for active suspension systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…) + = . Therefore, this paper proposes the controller (15) for the constraint following of uncertain MSs:…”
Section: Robust Control Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…) + = . Therefore, this paper proposes the controller (15) for the constraint following of uncertain MSs:…”
Section: Robust Control Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The controller (15 ) involves two tunable control gains, and they directly affect the constraint-following performance and the control cost. From an economic perspective, one may be interested in finding the optimal combination of [ ] T that can reach the equilibrium between the system performance and control cost.…”
Section: Optimization Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Constraints could be seen everywhere in practical systems, for instance, car suspension [23,24], motor servo systems [25,26], mobile manipulators [27], and chemical systems [28]; the violation of constraints is a main source of reducing control quality and even causing instability. Logarithm barrier Lyapunov functions were first proposed for constant output constraints in [29] to ensure that system output stays within the prescribed barrier functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%