2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraint effect on the ductile crack growth resistance of circumferentially cracked pipes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…3b, which is equivalent to the initially 90 degree intercept method. The same procedure using a fixed node to calculate CTOD has been utilized in [32][33][34][35][36]. The results will be used to propose approximate CTOD models that can be utilized to estimate the CTOD based on given loadings and temperatures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3b, which is equivalent to the initially 90 degree intercept method. The same procedure using a fixed node to calculate CTOD has been utilized in [32][33][34][35][36]. The results will be used to propose approximate CTOD models that can be utilized to estimate the CTOD based on given loadings and temperatures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature, several (numerical) studies indicate that the constraint in SENT specimens is comparable to pipe specimens [14,50]. Additionally considering the previously published correspondence in constraint between pipe and wide plate specimens [17], it was therefore expected for wide plate and SENT specimens to experience a similar constraint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nyhus et al 23,24 pointed out that the geometry constraint of SENT specimen is closer to the pipe than SENB specimen. Xu et al 25 pointed out that the SENT specimens are the good representation of flawed pipes and can be used in the assessment of pipes. Larrosa and Ainsworth 26 found that it will reduce the excessive conservatism in fracture assessment when the fracture behavior of the test specimen with a similar constraint was used.…”
Section: 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,[23][24][25][26] Chiesa et al 17 found that the constraint state of the pipeline with a/W = 0.75 is correspond to the SENT specimen with a/W = 0.6. Nyhus et al 23,24 pointed out that the geometry constraint of SENT specimen is closer to the pipe than SENB specimen.…”
Section: 11mentioning
confidence: 99%