2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2003.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining the efficiency of turbidity current generation from submarine debris flows and slides using laboratory experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
86
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
86
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, regions III (see Amy et al, 2006) and region VI (see e.g. Hampton, 1972;Ilstad et al, 2004;Marr et al, 2001;Mohrig et al, 1999;Mohrig & Marr, 2003) were left with an open boundary to further experiments and perhaps the creation of a complementary experimental-derived classification of sediment gravity flows. …”
Section: Spatial Evolution Of the Sediment Gravity Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, regions III (see Amy et al, 2006) and region VI (see e.g. Hampton, 1972;Ilstad et al, 2004;Marr et al, 2001;Mohrig et al, 1999;Mohrig & Marr, 2003) were left with an open boundary to further experiments and perhaps the creation of a complementary experimental-derived classification of sediment gravity flows. …”
Section: Spatial Evolution Of the Sediment Gravity Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The poorly-sorted, weakly stratified pebbly mudstones/sandstones may have been deposited from coarse debris melting out of surface ice and minimally transported by downslope currents. See discussions by Sohn (1997), Mutti et al (1999), Shanmugam (2000Shanmugam ( , 2002, Mutti et al (2003), and Mohrig and Marr (2003) when referring to debris flows, sandy debris flows, high-density turbidity current, hyperconcentrated flow, granular flow and flowslides.…”
Section: Lithostratigraphic Unit 13 (2057-3707 Mbsf )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sohn, 1997;Mutti et al, 1999;Shanmugam, 2000Shanmugam, , 2002Mutti et al, 2003;Mohrig and Marr, 2003). It is common for these currents, in submarine settings, to be thin but widespread.…”
Section: Evidence For Shallow Water Depths From Other Sedimentary Strmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that slumps or retrogressive failures (van den Berg et al 2002) generated currents formed in the delta front, possibly in mouth bars, and then evolved into turbidity currents. It has been argued based on experimental observations (Mohrig and Marr 2003) and theoretical grounds (Swift 1985), however, that the conversion of a debris flow into a turbidity current is inefficient, especially on the low slopes typical of nearshore settings. One also might expect sandy slump and debris-flow deposits on the prodelta, and no such features have been noted (although muddy debris flow deposits do occur in the lower few meters of some distal sections, as discussed by Myrow et al 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%