2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2011.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining the age of the last interglacial–glacial transition in the Hudson Bay lowlands (Canada) using U–Th dating of buried wood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of U-series dating to fossil wood is difficult because of the lack or very negligible content of uranium in the structure of living trees (Allard et al, 2012). Our data testify that despite the low specific activity of uranium isotopes, they are present in measurable concentrations and show that modern wood is able to incorporate uranium from the groundwater while excluding thorium.…”
Section: Radiocarbon Dating Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The application of U-series dating to fossil wood is difficult because of the lack or very negligible content of uranium in the structure of living trees (Allard et al, 2012). Our data testify that despite the low specific activity of uranium isotopes, they are present in measurable concentrations and show that modern wood is able to incorporate uranium from the groundwater while excluding thorium.…”
Section: Radiocarbon Dating Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In the case of our study, however, geochemically open behavior in 5 samples precluded the application of these corrections. Comparison between the uncorrected and corrected ages of fossil wood indicates that the magnitude of the correction is often less than the analytical errors derived for samples contained negligible Th contamination (Allard et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kleman et al, 2010) that have survived modification and, in some places, been dated to periods prior to the LGM (e.g. Allard et al, 2012;Dalton et al, 2016).…”
Section: Inception and Build-up To Its Last Glacial Maximummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dating that was then undetected -anomalous fading (Huntley and Lamothe 2001), which has the main pitfall of yielding age underestimates. Recently, U-series dating was applied to fossil logs of an extensive nonglacial unit east of James Bay (Allard et al 2012). The analyses revealed that these fossil logs were part of a geochemical system suitable for Th-U dating, yielding 230 Th/U ages ranging from 119 to 99 ka, thus indicating that one of the nonglacial units present in the James Bay basin belongs to the last interglaciation sensu stricto (i.e., MIS 5e; ϳ130-114 ka).…”
Section: James Bay Lowlands Stratigraphy and The Labrador-quebec Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%