2019
DOI: 10.5194/acp-19-5331-2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining the aerosol influence on cloud liquid water path

Abstract: Abstract. The impact of aerosols on cloud properties is one of the largest uncertainties in the anthropogenic radiative forcing of the climate. Significant progress has been made in constraining this forcing using observations, but uncertainty remains, particularly in the magnitude of cloud rapid adjustments to aerosol perturbations. Cloud liquid water path (LWP) is the leading control on liquid-cloud albedo, making it important to observationally constrain the aerosol impact on LWP. Previous modelling and obs… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

41
270
9

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(320 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(166 reference statements)
41
270
9
Order By: Relevance
“…For MODIS/Terra, λ is −0.09 (95% confidence interval: −0.31 to 0.08) and for MODIS/Aqua, λ is −0.39 (−0.68 to −0.14), giving a daily mean λ value of −0.24 (−0.42 to −0.08). These λ values are at the more negative end of estimates previously reported in the literature, as compiled by Sato and Suzuki (2019), and are in line with the values for higher N d from Gryspeerdt, Goren et al (2019) and lower r e from Toll et al (2019). However, as the relationship between liquid water path and cloud droplet number is not necessarily linear in relative changes or even monotonic (Gryspeerdt, Goren et al, 2019), there is uncertainty inherent in applying the λ values estimated here more broadly (particularly in regions with greater precipitation).…”
Section: Cloud Macrophysical Changessupporting
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For MODIS/Terra, λ is −0.09 (95% confidence interval: −0.31 to 0.08) and for MODIS/Aqua, λ is −0.39 (−0.68 to −0.14), giving a daily mean λ value of −0.24 (−0.42 to −0.08). These λ values are at the more negative end of estimates previously reported in the literature, as compiled by Sato and Suzuki (2019), and are in line with the values for higher N d from Gryspeerdt, Goren et al (2019) and lower r e from Toll et al (2019). However, as the relationship between liquid water path and cloud droplet number is not necessarily linear in relative changes or even monotonic (Gryspeerdt, Goren et al, 2019), there is uncertainty inherent in applying the λ values estimated here more broadly (particularly in regions with greater precipitation).…”
Section: Cloud Macrophysical Changessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Our results join a growing literature of studies using "natural experiments" like volcanic eruptions and the inadvertent modification of clouds from international shipping, which overall have tended to find that climate model estimates of the effective radiative forcing due to aerosol-cloud interactions are likely too negative due to overly strong adjustments that reinforce the Twomey effect (Gryspeerdt, Goren et al, 2019;Malavelle et al, 2017;Toll et al, 2017Toll et al, , 2019. These previous papers, however, have generally taken a "bottom-up" approach of aggregating statistics of individual pollution tracks to reach their conclusions, whereas we take a "top-down" approach to study aerosol-cloud interactions using climatological fields.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations