2014
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/06/055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining thawing and freezing models with cluster number counts

Abstract: Measurements of the cluster abundance as a function of mass and redshift provide an important cosmological test that probe not only the expansion rate but also the growth of perturbations. In this paper we adopt a scalar field scenario which admits both thawing and freezing solutions from an appropriate choice of the model parameters and derived all relevant expressions to calculate the mass function and the cluster number density. We discuss the ability of cluster observations to distinguish between these sca… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[3,[60][61][62][63]). It is worth noticing that the observed void counts promise to give complementary constraints to the cluster method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3,[60][61][62][63]). It is worth noticing that the observed void counts promise to give complementary constraints to the cluster method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly eROSITA is expected to measure a higher number of clusters than the SPT, peaking at z ≈ 0.28 where the differences relative to ΛCDM, at this redshift, are ∆N ≈ 47 000 and ∆N ≈ 110 000 for β = 0.05 and β = 0.08, respectively. These numbers are much higher than the expected eROSITA sensitivity of ∆N ≈ 500 [42,76] suggesting once again a possibility to discriminate between models with eROSITA. The values found for N with β = 0 (ΛCDM) are, as expected, consistent with prior studies [65,81].…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In regard to our previous analysis, we follow to compute the predicted number of cluster-sized objects for future surveys and shed some light on their ability to distinguish between theoretical models. Prior studies have implemented a similar analysis for different theoretical models, such as disformally coupled [65], thawing [73] and freezing [76] models of dark energy.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is found that there is hardly any reason to favour any of these two if the complete history of universe in the post radiation-dominated is considered. Thawing and freezing models, in terms of cluster number counts, have been discussed by Devi, Gonzales and Alcaniz [18]. The purpose of the present work is to compare the thawing and freezing models considering their thermodynamic behaviour, particularly their viability against the generalized second law (GSL) of thermodynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%