2004
DOI: 10.1086/421110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining Solar Abundances Using Helioseismology

Abstract: Recent analyses of solar photospheric abundances suggest that the oxygen abundance in the solar atmosphere needs to be revised downwards. In this study we investigate the consequence of this revision on helioseismic analyses of the depth of the solar convection zone and the helium abundance in the solar envelope and find no significant effect. We also find that the revised abundances along with the current OPAL opacity tables are not consistent with seismic data. A significant upward revision of the opacity ta… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

26
359
6
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 270 publications
(393 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
26
359
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Its abundance can be inferred from the solar wind and corona, but the value is poorly-constrained and highly variable. Theoretical models of stellar evolution and the data from helioseismology (Basu and Antia, 2004) provide a more accurate estimate, consistent with each other to 10% (see below); • light elements Li, B, and B are determined from the solar spectrum. The important lines, are, however, model dependent: because of very low abundances and very simple electronic configurations, the atoms give rise to one or few spectral lines only (Li I) or they are located in a very problematic part of a spectrum (Be II, B I).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Its abundance can be inferred from the solar wind and corona, but the value is poorly-constrained and highly variable. Theoretical models of stellar evolution and the data from helioseismology (Basu and Antia, 2004) provide a more accurate estimate, consistent with each other to 10% (see below); • light elements Li, B, and B are determined from the solar spectrum. The important lines, are, however, model dependent: because of very low abundances and very simple electronic configurations, the atoms give rise to one or few spectral lines only (Li I) or they are located in a very problematic part of a spectrum (Be II, B I).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Theoretical methods include inversions of helioseismic data (e.g. Basu and Antia, 2004) and nucleosynthesis models for heavy noble gases (e.g. Asplund et al, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The He mass fraction Y is smaller than that in previous compilations, but the (rounded) He abundance is the same for the three compilations in Table 4. The hydrogen mass fraction of X=0.739 (Basu & Anita 2004) adopted here is essentially the same as in A05/G07, and the smaller value for GS98 seems to be due to the different model assumptions for deriving the He abundance there. Overall, the mass fractions derived here are closer to the ~10 year old GS98 compilation than to the most recent ones by L03, A05 or G07.…”
Section: Mass Fractions X Y and Z In Present-day Solar Materialsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Basu & Anita (2004, 2008 have shown that the estimated mass faction of H from helioseismic models is relatively independent on Z/X ratios in the range of 0.0171 < Z/X < 0.0245. Their models calibrated to Z/X=0.0171 and 0.0218 yield an average X=0.7389±0.0034 (Basu & Anita 2004). If the H mass fraction is indeed independent of the Z/X ratio, and if compositional variations within Z (mainly governed by the mass fractions of O, C, Ne, see below) also do not alter this conclusion much, we can use this X to estimate the He mass fraction.…”
Section: Mass Fractions X Y and Z In Present-day Solar Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9) of the glitch, and with an amplitude which depends on the amplitude of the glitch and which decays with ν once the inverse radial wavenumber of the mode becomes comparable with or less than the radial extent of the glitch. Various approximate formulae for the oscillatory components that are associated with the helium ionization have been suggested and used, by e.g., Basu et al (1994); Basu & Antia (2004), Monteiro & Thompson (1998, 2005, and Gough (2002), not all of which are derived directly from explicit acoustic glitches. Gough used an analytic function for modelling the dip in the first adiabatic exponent γ 1 = (∂ ln p/∂ ln ρ) s , where p, ρ and s are pressure, density and specific entropy.…”
Section: Diagnostics Of Acoustic Glitchesmentioning
confidence: 99%