2014
DOI: 10.1002/2013jb010387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining particle size‐dependent plume sedimentation from the 17 June 1996 eruption of Ruapehu Volcano, New Zealand, using geophysical inversions

Abstract: Weak subplinian-plinian plumes pose frequent hazards to populations and aviation, yet many key parameters of these particle-laden plumes are, to date, poorly constrained. This study recovers the particle size-dependent mass distribution along the trajectory of a well-constrained weak plume by inverting the dispersion process of tephra fallout. We use the example of the 17 June 1996 Ruapehu eruption in New Zealand and base our computations on mass per unit area tephra measurements and grain size distributions a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variability of the thickness data is determined as the standard deviation of 5 to 8 thickness measurements at a single location, and is between 17 and 2%. The uncertainty on isopach areas is determined following the results from Klawonn et al [2014], as 30% for the two most distal isopach lines (displayed in Figure 1b), and 10% in the medial area of the deposit (7 to 20 km from vent). No proximal isopach lines were mapped due to the absence of thickness and mass per unit area measurements within 7 km from the vent.…”
Section: Fallout Deposit (Vent-derived and Co-pdc Contributions)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variability of the thickness data is determined as the standard deviation of 5 to 8 thickness measurements at a single location, and is between 17 and 2%. The uncertainty on isopach areas is determined following the results from Klawonn et al [2014], as 30% for the two most distal isopach lines (displayed in Figure 1b), and 10% in the medial area of the deposit (7 to 20 km from vent). No proximal isopach lines were mapped due to the absence of thickness and mass per unit area measurements within 7 km from the vent.…”
Section: Fallout Deposit (Vent-derived and Co-pdc Contributions)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of inversion algorithms have been proposed to estimate eruption parameters from tephra fallout deposits. These include grid search methods [Pfeiffer et al, 2005], linear inversions that make assumptions about the geometry of the eruption column, wind field and/or granulometry distribution [Bonasia et al, 2010;Klawonn et al, 2012Klawonn et al, , 2014, and nonlinear methods such as the downhill simplex method [Connor and Connor, 2006;Volentik et al, 2010].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated in several papers (Carey and Sigurdsson 1982;Bonadonna et al 2016;Taddeucci et al 2011;Brown et al 2012b;Klawonn et al 2014a), particle aggregation can significantly affect the dispersal process and the tephra depositional pattern. For this reason, we extend our study considering a simple aggregation process occurring within the margin of the column, as proposed by Textor et al (2006).…”
Section: Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To this aim, we use a Monte Carlo method, perturbing the data with a random uniform error on isomass squared root areas. A range of ±10 %, similar to the uncertainty estimated in Klawonn et al (2014a) when drawing isopach by hand, is used. Afterwards, we express the confidence interval with the 5 th and 95 th percentiles (see error bar in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison With Reconstruction Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%