The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2109.11895
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining nuclear matter parameters and neutron star observables using PREX-2 and NICER data

Abstract: We try to constraints some of the nuclear matter parameters such as symmetry energy (J) and its slope (L) from the recent inferred data of the PREX-2. Other nuclear matter parameters are adopted from [Phys. Rev. C 85 035201 (2012), Phys. Rev. C 90 055203 ( 2014)] papers and the linear correlation among them are checked by using the Pearson's formula. We find the correlation between J − L, Kτ − J and Kτ − L with coefficients 0.85, 0.81 and 0.76 respectively. The neutron star properties such as mass and radius a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 67 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A meaningful comparison between the regimes probed in BNS mergers and HICs requires a realistic, consistent model for the EOS that is valid across a very large portion of the QCD phase diagram. Such a description should be consistent with constraints from cold compact stars (e.g., [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]), properties of symmetric nuclear matter around nuclear saturation density n sat [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55], as well as large temperature QCD constraints at vanishing and finite density. In the latter case, a consistent description for chiralsymmetry restoration and quark deconfinement must be included to reproduce data from lattice QCD [56][57][58], perturbative QCD [59,60], and high-energy collider experiments [61].…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…A meaningful comparison between the regimes probed in BNS mergers and HICs requires a realistic, consistent model for the EOS that is valid across a very large portion of the QCD phase diagram. Such a description should be consistent with constraints from cold compact stars (e.g., [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]), properties of symmetric nuclear matter around nuclear saturation density n sat [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55], as well as large temperature QCD constraints at vanishing and finite density. In the latter case, a consistent description for chiralsymmetry restoration and quark deconfinement must be included to reproduce data from lattice QCD [56][57][58], perturbative QCD [59,60], and high-energy collider experiments [61].…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%