2022
DOI: 10.1007/jhep07(2022)138
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining new physics with Borexino Phase-II spectral data

Abstract: We present a detailed analysis of the spectral data of Borexino Phase II, with the aim of exploiting its full potential to constrain scenarios beyond the Standard Model. In particular, we quantify the constraints imposed on neutrino magnetic moments, neutrino non-standard interactions, and several simplified models with light scalar, pseudoscalar or vector mediators. Our analysis shows perfect agreement with those performed by the collaboration on neutrino magnetic moments and neutrino non-standard interaction… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, neutrino experiments [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] and dark-matter direct detection experiments [24][25][26][27][28] have become increasingly important tools for studying the physics beyond the Standard Model [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. Among these experiments, XENONnT [27] and Borexino [15][16][17] are particularly noteworthy for their sensitivity to relatively low-energy new physics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, neutrino experiments [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] and dark-matter direct detection experiments [24][25][26][27][28] have become increasingly important tools for studying the physics beyond the Standard Model [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. Among these experiments, XENONnT [27] and Borexino [15][16][17] are particularly noteworthy for their sensitivity to relatively low-energy new physics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neutrino experiments that probe electron-neutrino or coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEνNS) are sensitive to the contribution of X to their amplitudes [100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107]. Experiments searching decays into invisible final states can also be used to set constraints with the assumption that invisible states can be treated as decays to neutrino final states [108][109][110][111][112].…”
Section: Other Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare our results with the existing limits from other CEνNS experiments, in particular CONNIE [110], CONUS [12] and Dresden-II [26], from the analysis given in ref. [88] of two multi-ton DM experiments (namely XENONnT [111] and LZ [112]), from the analysis of solar neutrino data collected by Borexino [113], from collider experiments [43], including BaBar [114] and LHCb [115], and from rare meson decays at NA48 [116]. In the ∼ 1 GeV mass region, we also show bounds from beam-dump experiments [41,117], including E141 [118,119], E137 [120], E774 [121], KEK [122], Orsay [123], U70/ν-CAL I [124,125], CHARM [126,127], NO-MAD [128], NA64 [129,130] and the fixed target experiments A1 [131] and APEX [132].…”
Section: Light Mediatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%