2014
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/03/046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining models off(R) gravity with Planck and WiggleZ power spectrum data

Abstract: In order to explain cosmic acceleration without invoking "dark" physics, we consider f (R) modified gravity models, which replace the standard Einstein-Hilbert action in General Relativity with a higher derivative theory. We use data from the WiggleZ Dark Energy survey to probe the formation of structure on large scales which can place tight constraints on these models. We combine the large-scale structure data with measurements of the cosmic microwave background from the Planck surveyor. After parameterizing … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
81
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
(222 reference statements)
9
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason when lensing is added in Mock-C, the tension in A L , that for the lensing data set is smaller, pushes the posterior of B 0 toward smaller values, making it closer to GR. A similar effect was also observed for the Planck-2015 data set [26] and in the Planck-2013 data [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…For this reason when lensing is added in Mock-C, the tension in A L , that for the lensing data set is smaller, pushes the posterior of B 0 toward smaller values, making it closer to GR. A similar effect was also observed for the Planck-2015 data set [26] and in the Planck-2013 data [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Similarly strong constraints can be obtained from the absence of deviations in luminosity distances from different types of distance indicators in unscreened dwarf galaxies [24]. Current cosmological constraints are about 2 orders of magnitude weaker than Solar System bounds [25][26][27]. We refer to Ref.…”
Section: Fig 1: Leftmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(16) provides an accurate way of modeling the kSZ spectrum in the fðRÞ models under consideration, allowing one to explore the parameter space in a much faster way. Let us notice that the fitting parameters in (17), and possibly the optimal fitting curve, may change if a different range of values for jf 0 R j is considered.…”
Section: Fitting Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, viable fðRÞ models have been constrained with secondary CMB anisotropies, such as CMB lensing, the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect [7,8] and its cross-correlation with galaxy density [9,10], galaxy cluster abundances [11][12][13] and profiles [14,15], galaxy power spectrum [16,17], redshift-space distortions from spectroscopic surveys [18][19][20], weak gravitational lensing [21,22], 21-cm intensity mapping [23], and dwarf galaxies [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%