2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.91.044012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining models of extended gravity using Gravity Probe B and LARES experiments

Abstract: We consider models of Extended Gravity and in particular, generic models containing scalartensor and higher-order curvature terms, as well as a model derived from noncommutative spectral geometry. Studying, in the weak-field approximation, the geodesic and Lense-Thirring processions, we impose constraints on the free parameters of such models by using the recent experimental results of the Gravity Probe B and LARES satellites.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
76
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples include ChernsSimons gravity [45,46], conformal gravity [47], pseudo-complex GR [48], the TensorVector-Scalar theory (TeVeS) that developed as a relativistic generalization of Modified Newtonian Dynamics or MOND [49], noncommutative spectral geometry [50], HoravaLifshitz gravity [51], and Extended Gravity, in which the action is allowed to depend on a general function of the Ricci scalar [52].…”
Section: The Standard Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include ChernsSimons gravity [45,46], conformal gravity [47], pseudo-complex GR [48], the TensorVector-Scalar theory (TeVeS) that developed as a relativistic generalization of Modified Newtonian Dynamics or MOND [49], noncommutative spectral geometry [50], HoravaLifshitz gravity [51], and Extended Gravity, in which the action is allowed to depend on a general function of the Ricci scalar [52].…”
Section: The Standard Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These corrections to the gravitational Lagrangian were already considered by several authors [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]). From a conceptual viewpoint, there is no reason a priori to restrict the gravitational Lagrangian to a linear function of the Ricci scalar minimally coupled to matter [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The subscript Λ to the spectral action is needed to differentiate it from the ζ spectral action which we introduce below and indicate as S ζ . 3 The momentum of the cutoff function associated with the gauge couplings at unification has been constrained by astrophysical data [15][16][17][18]. 4 The action contains terms depending on all fermion's Yukawa couplings, which, however, can be ignored given the top predominance.…”
Section: Cutoff Bosonic Spectral Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%