2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.100.063535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining graviton non-Gaussianity through the CMB bispectra

Abstract: Tensor non-Gaussianities are a key ingredient to test the symmetries and the presence of higher spin fields during the inflationary epoch. Indeed, the shape of the three point correlator of the graviton is totally fixed by the symmetries of the de Sitter stage and, in the case of parity conservation, gets contributions only from the ordinary gravity action plus a higher derivative term called the (Weyl) 3 action. We discuss current and future bounds on the three point tensor contribution from the (Weyl) 3 term… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For r = 0.064 the expected tensor non gaussianity is high being f NL (ξ 5) 157, but it decreases with r: f NL (ξ 5) 10 for r = 0.01 and f NL (ξ 5) 0.31 for r = 0.001. These values are allowed by the present bounds on primordial non gaussianity [41][42][43][44]. In figure 6 we finally plot n t as a function of ξ for the same Figure 6: The tensor tilt as a function of ξ for three different values of the tensor to scalar ratio r: r = 0.064 (green line), r = 0.01 (blue line) and r = 0.001 (red line).…”
Section: Particle Production During Inflationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For r = 0.064 the expected tensor non gaussianity is high being f NL (ξ 5) 157, but it decreases with r: f NL (ξ 5) 10 for r = 0.01 and f NL (ξ 5) 0.31 for r = 0.001. These values are allowed by the present bounds on primordial non gaussianity [41][42][43][44]. In figure 6 we finally plot n t as a function of ξ for the same Figure 6: The tensor tilt as a function of ξ for three different values of the tensor to scalar ratio r: r = 0.064 (green line), r = 0.01 (blue line) and r = 0.001 (red line).…”
Section: Particle Production During Inflationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Due to the gauge dependence of Ω GW , it is natural to ask which gauge is relevant in interpreting the observations. This problem is solved by De Luca et al [75] where the authors argued that, for LISA-like GW detectors, the physical quantities are measured in synchronous gauge. The authors consider the time delay of a photon travelling between the two satellites of LISA.…”
Section: Gauge Issue Of Scalar Induced Gravitational Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [75,76,174], the authors calculated the SIGWs in the absence of E mode but considering its derivatives where the gauge freedom are completely fixed. In this situation, the energy density of SIGWs agrees with that in Newton gauge.…”
Section: Gauge Issue Of Scalar Induced Gravitational Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth stressing that these combinations are not realized by the usual parity-conserving theories like Einstein gravity (for which the sum defined in (4.57) has to be even) and therefore they can become robust indicators of parity breaking models with odd tensor bispectra if they are detected. According to the latest forecasts and previsions (see, e.g., [90,91,111,114]), forthcoming CMB experiments focusing on the polarization field (like, e.g., the LiteBIRD mission) will be able to probe order 1 amplitudes of tensor squeezed non-Gaussianities through the measurement of the CMB angular bispectra involving the B modes. This would justify a more detailed analysis of the detection prospects of these models in CMB angular bispectra in view of next experiments focusing on the search for the B-mode polarization field of the CMB.…”
Section: Comments and Observational Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%