2016
DOI: 10.1109/tcyb.2015.2461651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constrained Multiobjective Optimization Algorithm Based on Immune System Model

Abstract: An immune optimization algorithm, based on the model of biological immune system, is proposed to solve multiobjective optimization problems with multimodal nonlinear constraints. First, the initial population is divided into feasible nondominated population and infeasible/dominated population. The feasible nondominated individuals focus on exploring the nondominated front through clone and hypermutation based on a proposed affinity design approach, while the infeasible/dominated individuals are exploited and i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These two goals are mutually restrictive and contradictory. Supposing X is a decision space of 14 dimensions and Y is a two-dimensional target space, then the multi-objective optimization can be expressed as a constrained nonlinear problem shown as follows 23 where x = ( x 1 , x 2 , …, x n ) ∈ X is the decision vector composed of optimization parameters, x j is a parameter to be optimized, n is the number of parameters; and f ( x ) = ( f 1 ( x ), f 2 ( x )) is the objective vector. The function f ( x ) is two mapping functions f : X → Y , in which f 1 ( x ) and f 2 ( x ) are the motor output torque average T and torque ripple k , respectively.…”
Section: Design and Modeling Of Fspmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two goals are mutually restrictive and contradictory. Supposing X is a decision space of 14 dimensions and Y is a two-dimensional target space, then the multi-objective optimization can be expressed as a constrained nonlinear problem shown as follows 23 where x = ( x 1 , x 2 , …, x n ) ∈ X is the decision vector composed of optimization parameters, x j is a parameter to be optimized, n is the number of parameters; and f ( x ) = ( f 1 ( x ), f 2 ( x )) is the objective vector. The function f ( x ) is two mapping functions f : X → Y , in which f 1 ( x ) and f 2 ( x ) are the motor output torque average T and torque ripple k , respectively.…”
Section: Design and Modeling Of Fspmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jan and Khanum [15] proposed two modified constraint-handling techniques by combining Tchebycheff aggregation function with the famous stochastic ranking [16] and CDP [7] to solve CMOPs. Very recently, an immune optimization algorithm is proposed by Qian et al [17] to solve CMOPs. Taking both convergence and diversity into account, they divided a population into two subpopulations and applied different reproduction operators to create the next population.…”
Section: A Comparative Study Of Constraint-handling Techniques In Evomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a promising e-health system based on wearable Internet of Things (IoTs) [6] is proposed to address above public health crisis, by continuously sensing users' real-time health information, e.g., temperature, heart rate, blood pressure, and electrocardiogram, etc. In the e-healthcare system, a sever is deployed to collect the health data and detect the abnormal phenomena for providing supporting information of diagnoses [7] [8]. With the analysis on the health data, the medical centre can observe the users' health conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%