2013 MTS/IEEE OCEANS - Bergen 2013
DOI: 10.1109/oceans-bergen.2013.6608196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constrained MPC design for heave disturbance attenuation in offshore drilling systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The drilling fluid carries cuttings from the drill bit to the surface. In conventional (over-balanced) drilling, or managed pressure drilling (MPD), the pressure in the well is kept greater than pressure of reservoir to prevent influx from entering the well (Nikoofard et al (2014c(Nikoofard et al ( , 2013). But in UBD operations, the pressure of the well is kept below the pressure of the reservoir, allowing formation fluid flow into the well during the drilling operation.…”
Section: Under Balanced Drillingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drilling fluid carries cuttings from the drill bit to the surface. In conventional (over-balanced) drilling, or managed pressure drilling (MPD), the pressure in the well is kept greater than pressure of reservoir to prevent influx from entering the well (Nikoofard et al (2014c(Nikoofard et al ( , 2013). But in UBD operations, the pressure of the well is kept below the pressure of the reservoir, allowing formation fluid flow into the well during the drilling operation.…”
Section: Under Balanced Drillingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD), a back-pressure pump in conjunction with a back pressure choke is used to control the pressure in the well, posing new control and estimation challenges. In a typical scenario, the control goal is to keep the pressure of the well (p well (t, x)) greater than pressure of the reservoir (p res (t, x)) to prevent influx from entering the well, but lower than the fracture pressure (p frac (t, x)) to avoid the loss of drilling fluids to the reservoir [1], [2] p res (t, x) < p well (t, x) < p frac (t, x)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In , two different disturbance rejection strategies, a nonlinear output regulation controller and a linear internal model controller, based on discretized partial differential equations are presented. In , a constrained model predictive controller is designed for handling heave disturbance and output regulation constraints. Later, Model Predictive Control (MPC) was used also in by assuming full knowledge of heave disturbance in the so‐called MPD Heave Lab .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although heave disturbance on floaters due to wave motions is inherently uncertain, and one cannot expect to know its frequency content precisely, all the cited works (except ) on heave disturbance challenge assume that the frequency of the disturbance is known. The heave disturbance model applied in is stochastic (second‐order filtered Gaussian white noise) describing sea waves in the north sea with assumption of finite water depth and limited fetch. As mentioned before, in MPD applications, downhole pressure should be kept within certain upper and lower bounds, which transforms into time‐domain performance objectives for the control system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%