2009
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2009.2015753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constrained Model Predictive Control of the Drive System With Mechanical Elasticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the methods allowing to introduce the restrictions of the values of state variables is predictive control. This method allows to introduce limitations as early as the controller design stage [6,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the methods allowing to introduce the restrictions of the values of state variables is predictive control. This method allows to introduce limitations as early as the controller design stage [6,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the methods allowing to introduce the restrictions of the values of state variables is predictive control. This method allows to introduce limitations as early as the controller design stage [6,15].The goal of this work is a comparison of various methods of restricting the amplitude of selected state variables of a drive with an elastic coupling and their influences on the dynamic properties of a drive. The comparison will encompass three control systems: the first one will use a classical PI controller with two additional feedbacks from selected state variables.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lately, the model based predictive control approach has been studied intensively for power electronic applications [16] and especially for drive systems with elastic coupled loads [17]. In [18], the MBPC approach was proven to be suitable for drive applications in terms of the achievable control performance, robustness against model-mismatches, and unexpected dynamics, as well as in terms of its online computation burden.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [18], the MBPC approach was proven to be suitable for drive applications in terms of the achievable control performance, robustness against model-mismatches, and unexpected dynamics, as well as in terms of its online computation burden. The MBPC speed control has already been used in [19] for a stiff drive system and in [17], [20], and [21] for an elastic coupled drive system. The proposed control approaches are based on a deeper theoretical basis starting with the well known PI SC across the PI-SS SC up to the MBPC SC .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is based on the optimization of a cost function pertaining to the difference between the output and the trajectory to be tracked [12]. MPC improves insensitivity to parameter variation and external disturbances and handles the state and control constraints [13], [14]. However, a nonlinear optimization problem has to be solved online to determine the optimal control, which limited its application to slow nonlinear systems for a long time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%