2021
DOI: 10.1109/joe.2020.2985599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constrained Control of Moored Ocean Current Turbines With Cyclic Blade Pitch Variations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the momentum portion of the blade element model determines the blade root angle according to the last rotor blade to pass its location. In addition, the open-and closed-loop flight controller is applied to move this OCT, which operates according to harmonic oscillations of blade root angles [44] [58].…”
Section: B Previously Developed Oct Simulation Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, the momentum portion of the blade element model determines the blade root angle according to the last rotor blade to pass its location. In addition, the open-and closed-loop flight controller is applied to move this OCT, which operates according to harmonic oscillations of blade root angles [44] [58].…”
Section: B Previously Developed Oct Simulation Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Position and power signals in all cases have perturbations at frequencies around 0.0036 Hz (periods around 4.6 minutes) that are likely related minimally damped position states being excited by low-frequency turbulence perturbations. The stability of moored ocean current turbines is discussed in detail in [58], and these oscillations can be dampened through active control.…”
Section: Oct Operating In An Oceanic Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear Model: The linearization process averages the MCT dynamics over the rotor rotation to remove the dependence on rotor azimuth angle and cable node states as suggested in [28] and is expanded to account for variable buoyancy control as proposed in [29] (with the justification that the linear and nonlinear models are in good agreement). The nonlinear dynamic model of the MCT is linearized around the equilibrium points, namely:…”
Section: Equations Of Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fill fractions are limited by the ratio between the buoyancy tank size 𝜈 B and the base buoyancy tank size 𝜈 b B (as formulated in ( 21)). It is noted that the linear model has one less state than the non-linear model as the rotor rotation angle state, 𝜙 r , is eliminated during the linearization process as described in [25]. Given that the nominal condition is defined by an averaged homogeneous flow speed of 𝑣 eq = 1.6m/s, the nominal states and control inputs are characterized by 𝑥 eq = [0 0 0 0 1.49 0 0 554.50 0.38 50 0.01 0.00 3.14] and 𝑢 eq = [0.4677 0.4677 − 188280].…”
Section: B Oct Dynamic Modeling For Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%