2001
DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.5159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constitutive IFN-α/β Signal for Efficient IFN-α/β Gene Induction by Virus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

11
90
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
11
90
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, it could be shown that defined DC cell populations react to different TLR stimuli and exhibit a specialized localization and migration pattern after in vivo stimulation with molecular pathogen compounds. Without stimulation, no YFP was detectable in vitro or in vivo, arguing against efficient protein production from any constitutive IFN␤ mRNA in untreated cells (18). The earliest time point YFP was detectable in vitro was Ϸ4 h after stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Also, it could be shown that defined DC cell populations react to different TLR stimuli and exhibit a specialized localization and migration pattern after in vivo stimulation with molecular pathogen compounds. Without stimulation, no YFP was detectable in vitro or in vivo, arguing against efficient protein production from any constitutive IFN␤ mRNA in untreated cells (18). The earliest time point YFP was detectable in vitro was Ϸ4 h after stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The regulation of constitutively induced type I IFN at the transcriptional level has mainly been studied in fibroblast cultures, in which it is clearly distinct from pathogen-induced IFN. While IRF3 and IRF7 are instrumental for PRR-triggered type I IFN production, they are dispensable for tonic type I IFN production [22,29]. On the other hand, AP-1 and NF-kB components are critically required for spontaneous type I IFN production, while being important, but not necessary, for pathogen-triggered IFN production [26,[29][30][31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though it is difficult to conclude from early reports whether spontaneous I IFN production was actually studied under sterile conditions, several recent studies have unequivocally shown that certain cell types indeed produce low, but significant, levels of type I IFNs in the absence of infection. This phenomenon of tonic type I IFN production has been observed in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) [22], myeloid dendritic cells [23,24], osteoclast precursors, and also in pDCs [25], where it is has been shown to modulate cell differentiation and immune responses. While the exact triggering mechanisms for spontaneous type I IFN production remain elusive for most cell types, it has been shown for osteoclast precursor cells that RANKL is responsible for the low, but constitute expression of IFN-β.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Referring to IRFknockout studies in mouse cells, there is substantial evidence that different IRFs substitute each other in a redundant manner to ensure a robust host defense against viral infections. 38,47 Redundancy guarantees a kind of dynamic diversity whereby a specific function for a particular biological response can be replaced by different regulatory pathways. 36 It is therefore conceivable that various differentiation states are somehow ''frozen'' within a cell population, enabling descendant clones to stay alive under appropriate selection conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%