Constitutive activity of the M1–M4 subtypes of muscarinic receptors in transfected CHO cells and of muscarinic receptors in the heart cells revealed by negative antagonists
Abstract:We investigated whether muscarinic receptors of the MrM 4 receptor subtypes are constitutively active. We have found that the synthesis of cyclic AMP was enhanced by the muscarinic antagonists atropine and N-methylscopolamine (NMS) in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably transfected with human m2 and m4 muscarinic receptor genes and in rat cardiomyocytes expressing the M2 receptor subtype, and that the production of inositul phosphates was inhibited by atropine and NVIS in CHO cells stably transfected with… Show more
“…Moreover, the response to clozapine was opposite to that elicited by atropine, which significantly increased cyclic AMP formation. This observation agrees with previous studies showing that the m2 receptor expressed in CHO and heart cells displays constitutive activity and that atropine and other muscarinic antagonists increase cyclic AMP accumulation likely by stabilizing the inactive conformation of the receptor (Jakubik et al 1995;Vogel et al 1995). As observed in CHO/m1 and m3 cells, the agonist efficacy of clozapine at the m2 receptor was lower than that of the full agonist carbachol, and, when the two drugs were combined, clozapine reduced the cyclic AMP inhibition elicited by carbachol to the level determined by its maximal effect.…”
“…Moreover, the response to clozapine was opposite to that elicited by atropine, which significantly increased cyclic AMP formation. This observation agrees with previous studies showing that the m2 receptor expressed in CHO and heart cells displays constitutive activity and that atropine and other muscarinic antagonists increase cyclic AMP accumulation likely by stabilizing the inactive conformation of the receptor (Jakubik et al 1995;Vogel et al 1995). As observed in CHO/m1 and m3 cells, the agonist efficacy of clozapine at the m2 receptor was lower than that of the full agonist carbachol, and, when the two drugs were combined, clozapine reduced the cyclic AMP inhibition elicited by carbachol to the level determined by its maximal effect.…”
“…K P Ͻ K P.G ). The same constraint was required in previous analyses with the ternary complex model (33), and it is consistent with reports that N- [ 3 H]-methylscopolamine is an inverse agonist (45). All other parameters were defined by a minimum in the sum of squares.…”
Section: Table 1 Parametric Values For the Binding Of Oxotremorine-m supporting
confidence: 55%
“…For assays with purified receptor in solution, buffer G was supplemented with 0.1% digitonin and 0.02% cholate. An aliquot of the ligand-containing solution (49 l for receptor in solution and vesicles, 43 l for receptor in nanodiscs) was added to the receptor (4 l, solution and vesicles; 10 l, nanodiscs) contained in a polypropylene microcentrifuge tube, and the reaction mixture was incubated at 30°C for 45 3 H]methylscopolamine, assays with and without GMP-PNP were performed in parallel; in studies at graded concentrations of oxotremorine-M, assays at 2-4 different concentrations of GMP-PNP were performed in parallel. Nonspecific binding was measured in the presence of unlabeled N-methylscopolamine (1 mM), which was premixed with the radioligand prior to the addition of the receptor.…”
Background:The allosteric interaction between agonists and guanylyl nucleotides reports on the interaction between G protein-coupled receptors and G proteins. Results: Such allostery differs in kind between reconstituted monomers and tetramers of the M 2 muscarinic receptor. Conclusion: Monomers and tetramers mediate allostery via different mechanisms. Significance: Only tetramers resemble muscarinic receptors in myocardial membranes in the nature of their sensitivity to guanylyl nucleotides.
“…Thus, the ability of atropine, and a subset of other mACh receptor antagonists, to suppress constitutive activity has been reported in membrane (Hilf and Jakobs, 1992) and intact (Jakubík et al, 1995) cell preparations endogenously or recombinantly expressing M 2 mACh receptors. Any constitutive activity exhibited by the wild-type receptor can often be enhanced by mutagenesis of key domains within the GPCR (Parnot et al, 2002;Seifert and Wenzel-Seifert, 2002).…”
Introduction of a single-point mutation (Asn to Tyr) at position 410 at the junction between transmembrane domain 6 and the third extracellular loop of the human M 2 muscarinic acetylcholine (mACh) receptor generated a mutant receptor (N410Y) that possesses many of the hallmark features of a constitutively active mutant receptor. These included enhanced agonist binding affinity and potency, in addition to agonist-independent accumulation of [ 3 H]inositol phosphates in cells coexpressing the chimeric G␣ qi5 protein and the N410Y mutant M 2 mACh receptor. Constitutive activity was sensitive to inhibition by a range of muscarinic ligands, including those used clinically in the management of overactive bladder (oxybutynin, tolterodine, and darifenacin), indicating that these ligands behave as inverse agonists at the M 2 mACh receptor. Long-term (24-h) treatment of Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing the N410Y mutant M 2 mACh receptor with certain mACh receptor inverse agonists (atropine, darifenacin, and pirenzepine) elicited a concentration-dependent up-regulation of cell surface receptor expression. However, not all ligands possessing negative efficacy in the [ 3 H]inositol phosphate accumulation assays were capable of significantly up-regulating receptor expression, perhaps indicating a spectrum of negative efficacies among ligands traditionally defined as mACh receptor antagonists. Finally, structurally distinct agonists exhibited differences in their relative potencies for the activation of G␣ i/o versus G␣ s , consistent with agonist-directed trafficking of signaling at the N410Y mutant, but not at the wild-type M 2 mACh receptor. This indicates that the N410Y mutation of the M 2 mACh receptor alters receptor-G-protein coupling in an agonist-dependent manner, in addition to generating a constitutively active receptor phenotype.A crucial development in our understanding of G-proteincoupled receptor (GPCR) function has been the identification of the ability of receptors to activate their cognate G-proteins in the absence of an agonist (Costa and Herz, 1989). Thus, certain ligands (termed inverse agonists and previously characterized as competitive antagonists) can inhibit agonist-independent receptor activity (Costa and Herz, 1989). Subsequent research has identified significant agonist-independent (constitutive) activity at a wide variety of both endogenously and recombinantly expressed GPCRs (for review, see Seifert and Wenzel-Seifert, 2002).One of the most powerful tools used by researchers in this area has been the development of GPCRs harboring specific mutations known to enhance the agonist-independent coupling of receptor and G-protein [so-called constitutively active mutant (CAM) receptors] (Seifert and Wenzel-Seifert, 2002). Mutations in a number of well conserved domains, including the D/ERY motif at the intracellular interface of the third transmembrane domain (TM3) and the BBXXB motif (where B is Arg or Lys) toward the C-terminal end of the third intracellular loop, have been reported to ...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.