Constitutions, Corporations, and Corruption: American States and Constitutional Change, 1842 to 1852

Abstract

Between 1842 and 1852, eleven states adopted new constitutions, simultaneously creating procedures for issuing government debt and for chartering corporations through general incorporation acts. Why simultaneously? Voters wanted geographically specific infrastructure investments but opposed geographically widespread taxation. States resolved the dilemma by developing several innovative public finance schemes. One, “taxless finance,” used borrowed funds and special corporate privileges without raising current taxes. Another scheme, “benefit taxation,” coordinated the incidence of taxes with the geographic benefits of investments through the property tax. After the fiscal crisis of the early 1840s, states changed their constitutions to eliminate taxless finance in the future.

The Eurozone Crisis: Muddling through on the Way to a More Perfect Euro Union?

“…In response, states' constitutions in the 1840s created procedures requiring state governments to raise taxes before they borrowed, and made those taxes irrevocable until the debt had been repaid. The success and the stability of the US dollar union were attributed to these institutional changes, where following the fiscal crisis of the early 1840s, states changed their constitutions to eliminate taxless finance in the future [27]. The combination of debt mutualization and restraints on states' borrowing probably explains the ability of the US Union to delay the formation of a Banking Union.…”

Corporate Governance and the Plight of Minority Shareholders in the United States before the Great Depression

“…State governments responded to these political pressures first by making it easier to secure a special charter, and then (around the middle of the nineteenth century) by passing general incorporation laws that routinized the whole process, enabling anyone who so desired to form a corporation by fulfilling some standard requirements, filing a form, and paying a fee. In the process, the corporation lost its public character and came to be thought of as a wholly private institution (Hurst 1970;Maier 1993;Bloch and Lamoreaux 2004;Wallis 2005).…”

Les marchés financiers : péril ou opportunité pour l'industrie ? Quelques enseignements d'un épisode oublié de l'histoire de la Bourse de Paris

“…Quelques entreprises sont cotées en Bourse assez tôt, comme la Banque de France (mais est-ce une entreprise tout à fait comme les autres, même à ses débuts privés ? ), quelques concessionnaires de canaux ou de ponts : toujours des services publics pour lesquels le capitalisme privé doit s'articuler à la puissance publique, ce que le contrôle étatique des créations de sociétés anonymes encourage fortement (sur cet entre-deux du mi-privé, mipublic, voir Dunlavy 2004, Smythe, 2006, Wallis, 2005. …”