2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-968x.2007.00188.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constituent question formation and focus: a new typological perspective

Abstract: All languages have strategies which enable speakers to ask constituent (‘wh’‐) questions. Of the strategies available, three types based on the notion of movement are usually cited in the literature: in situ, multiple fronting, and simple fronting. However, data reveal that focusing is the defining characteristic of constituent question formation cross‐linguistically. This paper therefore adopts a different approach, presenting a unified analysis within the non‐derivational framework of Lexical‐Functional Gram… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The question words which precede the one that has main stress bear a H monotone. This prosodic pattern is not affected by variation in the order of the question words (Mycock 2007a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The question words which precede the one that has main stress bear a H monotone. This prosodic pattern is not affected by variation in the order of the question words (Mycock 2007a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The question words which precede the one that has main stress bear a H monotone. This prosodic pattern is not affected by variation in the order of the question words (Mycock 2007a The most commonly attested pattern, as produced by Speaker F1, is shown in (37a). Similar to the pattern in (36), we see the initial question phrase melyik hallgato´'which student' realised with a H monotone, followed by the characteristic H+L accent on the immediately preverbal question word kit 'who'.…”
Section: Non-neutral Intonationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Hungarian is known to be prosodically dissimilar to English: the tonal organisation of an intonational phrase is entirely different in that nuclear accent is not sentence-final but sentence-initial and is not calculated on the basis of Cinque's stress deepest algorithm, but is always carried by the syntactic focus constituent, which is the wh-phrase in (53) (É. Kiss 2002, Szendrői 2003, Mycock 2007; see also Zubizarreta 1998, Kahnemuyipour 2004 on Cinque's SD not being universal). As WTH phrases are licit in sluicing constructions in Hungarian with WTHs receiving the most nuclear accent, we claim that in Hungarian, nuclear accent can align with WTHs, contrary to what we see in British English.…”
Section: Prosodic Licensing Of Wth In Swiping/sluicingmentioning
confidence: 99%