“Constant, Zig-Zag Linear, or Multiple?”: Thematic Progression Patterns on Efl Students’ Recount Texts

Abstract

The main problem faced by EFL students in writing English texts includes the difficulties to produce a cohesive and coherent text that it seems necessary to show how the tools of Theme and Rheme can be used to help construct the students' good English writing. This study aimed to find out the types of thematic progression patterns in each clause of the recount texts written by students and the dominant pattern of thematic progression revealed from the texts. The research design of this study is a qualitative method which employed the study instrument of the students' recount texts at class IX of SMAN 2 Langsa, Aceh. A content analysis approach by using a Theme and Rheme framework generated from a theory of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) was used to analyze the thematic progression patterns on the students' recount texts, which included several steps: reading the student's texts, identifying the theme and rheme of every clause of the student's text, describing the thematic progression patterns of student's text and drawing the thematic progression pattern on student's text. The findings of the analysis indicated that there are three (3) thematic progression patterns found on the students' recount texts: the Theme Constant, the Theme Zig Zag Linear pattern and Theme Multiple patterns. The dominant type of thematic progression patterns constructed by the students into their recount texts was revealed mostly on 123 constant or reiteration patterns (76.8%), followed by zig-zag patterns of 35 times (21.8%) and 9 times (1.25%) of multiple patterns. The results of this study will be facilitative as the tools for English language teaching and learning classrooms particularly for writing English texts.

Thematic Construction in the News Coverage of the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Pattern and Its Implication in Teaching English News-Item Text

“…Textual Themes are complex sub-themes (Kusumawardani & Putra, 2021), but it also help build new information that the author wants to reveal (Yulianti, 2022). In line with the concept of textual Themes, this function aims to connect arguments and maintain text cohesion (Devira et al, 2020). It is supported by Babaii et al (2016) stating that one of the ways to achieve cohesion is through thematicity.…”

Investigating the Application of Thematic Progression in EFL Writing: A Systematic Review

“…Admittedly, it does not mean that CTP patterns have no disadvantage. Since repeating themes in CTP patterns also bores readers and creates less new information (Devira et al, 2020), it is unsuitable for test writing with high complexity. This is why, in test writing, CTP patterns fail to dominate but SLP patterns take the first lead.…”

“…As for writing content, it is often evaluated regarding the adequacy of ideas, full development of the main idea, and relevance to a given topic. TP can enhance writing content to some degree as various TP patterns help learners organize their ideas, develop their ideas, and connect ideas with prior brainstorming to ensure the smoothness of understanding an argument and textual coherence (Devira et al, 2020;Nguyen & Nguyen, 2020;Bi, 2023). In terms of vocabulary and writing mechanics, they are not in forms of sentences or above sentences, which is a prerequisite of TP.…”