1992
DOI: 10.1016/0891-4222(92)90028-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constant time delay with discrete responses: A review of effectiveness and demographic, procedural, and methodological parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
57
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This replicates earlier research with response prompting procedures (Wolery, Holcombe, et al, 1992) and research with one-to-one arrangements with progressive time delay (Reichow & Wolery, 2011) that suggests that children "learn to learn", and that systematic prompting procedures become more efficient when children are taught multiple sets of behaviors over time. A related finding is that most participants emitted fewer errors during later versus earlier behavior sets.…”
Section: Academic Behaviorssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This replicates earlier research with response prompting procedures (Wolery, Holcombe, et al, 1992) and research with one-to-one arrangements with progressive time delay (Reichow & Wolery, 2011) that suggests that children "learn to learn", and that systematic prompting procedures become more efficient when children are taught multiple sets of behaviors over time. A related finding is that most participants emitted fewer errors during later versus earlier behavior sets.…”
Section: Academic Behaviorssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Error percentages were higher during instruction on the first behavior set; previous studies that did not teach multiple sets of behaviors to young children over time (e.g., when there were no opportunities to "learn to learn") reported similarly high levels of errors (e.g., 8.9%, Chiara et al, 1995;16.2%, Wolery et al, 1993). These percentages are higher than those reported in some reviews of the use of prompting procedures (Wolery, Holcombe, et al, 1992). Further research is needed to determine whether higher error percentages during initial instruction is likely for young children who have limited experience with direct instruction or direct instruction in small groups, and, if so, what modifications are appropriate to reduce the likelihood of errors.…”
Section: Academic Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 39%
“…The rapid learning of the targeted phrases or tasks and the low percentages of error while using time delay procedures was noted by Wolery et al (1992). Schuster et al (1998) reported that in the 20 studies they reviewed, there was 97% effectiveness in using time delay to teach target tasks to criterion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Second, we implemented a forward chaining procedure. Because we anticipated that Marcel would require more support to master these complex response chains than he did to master each chain's component skills, we used a 5-s constant time delay procedure (Wolery et al, 1992). That is, therapists immediately delivered the most intrusive prompt from phase 1 (i.e., continuous physical guidance with verbal prompts) during the first trial of any given training step (as well as immediately following any error emitted at any time).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%