2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10864-020-09396-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constant Time Delay and System of Least Prompts: Efficiency and Child Preference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of a constant-time-delay instructional approach also supports the effectiveness of this study because it is an evidence-based instructional approach that can be applied to teaching mathematics to students with intellectual disabilities and mathematics difficulties (Cannella-Malone et al, 2021; Chazin & Ledford, 2021; Creech-Galloway et al, 2013; Faragher & Clarke, 2014). This approach involves regular repetition of the teaching method by presenting mathematical concepts to students and expecting them to respond within a certain timeframe.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The use of a constant-time-delay instructional approach also supports the effectiveness of this study because it is an evidence-based instructional approach that can be applied to teaching mathematics to students with intellectual disabilities and mathematics difficulties (Cannella-Malone et al, 2021; Chazin & Ledford, 2021; Creech-Galloway et al, 2013; Faragher & Clarke, 2014). This approach involves regular repetition of the teaching method by presenting mathematical concepts to students and expecting them to respond within a certain timeframe.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Another limitation is that decision-making tools capture best-practice recommendations at a specific moment in time. Literature reviews and research on the use of various prompting strategies continue to be published every year (e.g., Cengher et al, 2020 ; Chazin & Ledford, 2021 ; Schnell et al, 2020 ). Although the basic recommendations pertaining to the use of these prompting strategies have remained generally consistent, future research may alter best-practice guidelines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the data collected show the student has achieved fluency of the script, the educator supports the student’s use of the script when small-group work again occurs in the general education classroom. Prompts should be faded using a time-delay procedure (Chazin & Ledford, 2020; Ganz et al, 2012) until the student independently uses the script in the appropriate context.…”
Section: Phase 3: Teach the Scriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Educators can fade the verbal prompt by using a procedure called time delay to encourage the student to read the script independently (Ganz et al, 2012). A time delay involves lengthening the time between an instruction or cue (e.g., "Say this script") and a prompt that assists the student until the student no longer needs assistance (Chazin & Ledford, 2020). For example, the educator might say "Say this script" while pointing to the word Can and waiting 5 seconds before saying the /k/ sound or saying can for the student to imitate.…”
Section: Step 1: Introduce the Script To The Studentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation