AIP Conference Proceedings 2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3114119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constant Group Velocity Ultrasonic Guided Wave Inspection for Corrosion and Erosion Monitoring in Pipes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional long-range UGW inspection is known to suffer from limited measurement sensitivity. Therefore, there has been growing interest in the use of the constant group velocity method [13], guided wave tomography [14,15], and high order modes [16], trading the inspection area for improved detectability. The constant group velocity method estimates average wall thickness loss using a flexural mode propagating between a pair of guided wave transducers located at a distance of several pipe diameters apart.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional long-range UGW inspection is known to suffer from limited measurement sensitivity. Therefore, there has been growing interest in the use of the constant group velocity method [13], guided wave tomography [14,15], and high order modes [16], trading the inspection area for improved detectability. The constant group velocity method estimates average wall thickness loss using a flexural mode propagating between a pair of guided wave transducers located at a distance of several pipe diameters apart.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of researchers have been interested in the application of ultrasonic guided waves for nondestructive inspection of plate and tube-like multilayered structures [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Guided waves are more and more used for ultrasonic nondestructive testing applications [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current GW long-range screening systems cannot provide accurate estimations of defect depth in the presence of complex morphologies [20,21]. Meanwhile, the constant group velocity method [22,23] provides a medium-range solution over a distance of several pipe diameters for a pitch catch arrangement of a pair of transducers; however, this approach lacks spatially localised information to quantify the maximum defect depth of irregularly shaped defects. In the 1990s, Hutchins et al [24] realised that combining multiple transmissions between transmitters and receivers and tomographic techniques increases the amount of spatially localised information.…”
Section: Figure 13: Conventional Ut Wave Path (Left) and Ultrasonic Gw Path (Right)mentioning
confidence: 99%