2007
DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2007.4352820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constant-Current Adjustable-Waveform Microstimulator for an Implantable Hybrid Neural Prosthesis

Abstract: Microstimulation of neural tissue has become a widely-used technique for controlling neuronal responses with local electric fields as well as a therapeutic intervention for nervous system disorders such as epilepsy and Parkinson's disease. Of those afflicted by neurological diseases, many are or become tolerant to existing pharmaceuticals and are left with little recourse. Little is known about the necessary design criteria or efficacy of a hybrid neural prosthesis. Assessment of the potential clinical value o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison, other research into microstimulators such as the clinically-targeted Bion [22] are much smaller and lower power, but correspondingly much more expensive, less flexible due to their high level of integration, and not matched for the high compliance voltage required by our electrodes. Integrated ASIC microstimulators such as [23] and [24] offer compliance of 11V or less, which is insufficient to drive current through high-impedance (more than 100kΩ) electrodes; full systems described in [25] offer insufficient latency and bandwidth for our experimental requirements. Finally, the current-mirror topology of integrated microstimulators does not guarantee low leakage current, which is critical as DC current will gradually erode the tips of electrodes and damage neural tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, other research into microstimulators such as the clinically-targeted Bion [22] are much smaller and lower power, but correspondingly much more expensive, less flexible due to their high level of integration, and not matched for the high compliance voltage required by our electrodes. Integrated ASIC microstimulators such as [23] and [24] offer compliance of 11V or less, which is insufficient to drive current through high-impedance (more than 100kΩ) electrodes; full systems described in [25] offer insufficient latency and bandwidth for our experimental requirements. Finally, the current-mirror topology of integrated microstimulators does not guarantee low leakage current, which is critical as DC current will gradually erode the tips of electrodes and damage neural tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%