2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-013-1640-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conspicuous displays in cryptic males of a polytypic poison-dart frog

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideally, comimic visual signals should be indistinguishable for predators but still distinguishable for frogs (Willink et al 2013). This result is consistent with the idea that the coloration of femoral patches was specifically shaped by natural selection represented by predators.…”
Section: Resemblance Under Variable Visual Systemssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ideally, comimic visual signals should be indistinguishable for predators but still distinguishable for frogs (Willink et al 2013). This result is consistent with the idea that the coloration of femoral patches was specifically shaped by natural selection represented by predators.…”
Section: Resemblance Under Variable Visual Systemssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Two general explanations for the evolution of conspicuous traits are their value in intraspecific (often intersexual) communication, as in mate choice; and their value in interspecific communication, often addressed to potential predators. Ideally, comimic visual signals should be indistinguishable for predators but still distinguishable for frogs (Willink et al 2013). Our data support this idea, although the pattern did not replicate in all localities.…”
Section: Resemblance Under Variable Visual Systemscontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…Observations of naturally occurring mating pairs of O. pumilio were conducted daily from 0600 to 1200 and 1500 to 1700, during the times in which male calling and male/female courtship are most common (Limerick ; Gardner & Graves ; Willink et al. ). Males were located by following the sounds of their advertisement calls.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a female was present within 2 m of the male, behavioral observations of the pair immediately began and lasted for 15 min. The observer stood at least 2 m away from the pair to avoid disrupting natural interactions (e.g., Limerick 1980;Willink et al 2014). For each trial, we recorded the total time a male spent calling, the total number of calling bouts (short periods of intense calling, followed by a short break), the direction a male was facing while calling (toward or away from the female), distance and direction males moved between call bouts, and the distance and direction a female moved.…”
Section: Behavioral Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modelling the sensory perception of various taxa has permitted the study of animal-animal interactions such as mate choice among color morphs in butterflies [1], the evolutionary trade-off between predator-driven crypsis and sexually-selected conspicuousness in Dendrobates frogs [2], the influence of insect warning coloration on the predatory behavior of foraging birds [3], and the rejection of brood parasite eggs by host species [4, 5]. Furthermore, visual modelling has been useful in studies of plant-animal interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%